garmin into sports software for betting

quaddie sportsbetting

When you choose a side against the spread and wager 11 to win 10, the book is essentially making a bet of 10 to win 11 on the other side. You can see how that would be a profitable model over time. The exception being more money coming in on a particular side from a few big bettors opposed to more tickets from the public in general.

Garmin into sports software for betting cryptocurrency exchange one coin

Garmin into sports software for betting

Said differently, when I evaluate the steady stream of issues that land at my virtual doorstep via comments, e-mails, tweets, and carrier pigeons, I try and question a few things no matter the brand :. A Was someone just confused?

B Was this already fixed in a firmware update? C If this is a legit issue, then is it widespread, or a very limited edge case? Perhaps the product user interface was poorly designed, or perhaps the experience was otherwise ripe for failure. The first three are pretty easy. The last question though, the ratio, is trickier. For example, I know that while I might see cases of a given problem on a Garmin Edge compared to instances of a problem on an Wahoo BOLT, I know that unit sales wise, in that scenario the Garmin actually trends better.

This is especially true the further up the endurance ladder you get. Garmin typically has adoption rates compared to Apple in 10KM and above events. And compared to Suunto? It ranges between upwards to Polar often half of that again. Obviously, if we look at total Apple Watch global sales numbers, they easily beat Garmin.

On the cycling side, things are shifting however. In some cases pretty drastically in the last year. Way higher than events a year ago. A bit of that tends to be semi-environmental and race-specific. And on average about 4xx more comments on a Garmin cycling issue than a Wahoo cycling issue. Same goes for forums.

Garmin actually has their own forums kudos , where people can post troubleshooting issues. Problems happen, the point is to resolve those problems. Not because LiveTrack is funny, but because you know — just like I and everyone else — that Garmin LiveTrack is horrifically unreliable. I know better. She wants to follow me, not assume I got hit by a car every time the connection drops permanently.

But I can do this all day with other bits. And I get it, as a technically minded person, I really do: LiveTrack is actually more complex than people realize. At present, if the Edge to phone aspect breaks, the whole thing crumbles, usually permanently.

From our experience, this is typically not the cause of dropped points. Cellular network availability is believed to be the main cause of dropped LiveTrack points. However, I have never-ending data points from people. Even one comment barely 12 hours old posted to the Edge review.

I have purchased successive Garmin edges…the latest being the What is going on with the LiveTracking feature? Garmin heavily promotes it but Live Track has not been working for over a year!! Try again later. Can someone finally get to the bottom of this. New , new IPhone….

Second, the sync function works only half the time…. Of course, I have no idea if this comment is fake. Or if the user is somehow at fault. I suspect neither though. As it always has been. Heck, even trying to take the photo above this morning would crash my Garmin Connect app each time I opened Live Track. This past weekend I did a triathlon race. Nothing complex, just a simple sprint triathlon where it had to track my openwater swim for a mere meters. Yet the watch lasted a mere 34 yards in the water before it forgot how to track my swim.

The next time it started tracking GPS was when I exited the water. Now in the world of endurance sports, openwater swim tracking is among the hardest things to do. Half of the time your watch is under the water without signal, the other half it has about 1 second to gain signal and determine a location before being plunged back in the water.

Yet somehow in the last year or so, Garmin has gotten really bad at it. Then again in an openwater swim video comparison video in July Again in the fall of in another openwater swim compilation piece. And more times privately and publicly since then. And now it gets worse, this same issue is impacting the Garmin Forerunner too — where some users are reporting 4 out of 5 swims are producing data that stops tracking after a few dozen meters.

And yet it fails less than 60 seconds into the main event. In discussing this issue with Garmin this past week they believe they have a fix in that may resolve the issue. Pending positive feedback from beta testers and additional internal testing, we are targeting a formal release at the end of June. However, last summer they said they had fixes in for it too. I refuse to believe people actually tested this functionality prior to this past week.

In noting though, Garmin says they do work with a large number of people to trial units:. We obviously have more runners and cyclists in the test group compared to swimmers, but we are continuing to add swimmers to help provide better real-world test coverage. We are continuously refining our testing procedures to provide the most comprehensive test coverage possible before public release.

It may be that population is told to just use the device like normal. And almost always with incentives for the people that filed the most bugs in that section. My proposal is simple, at least on paper. Not everything was a bug per se, but rather, just a lack of focus on security. You can read the famed letter here.

But in particular, there are two small paragraphs that I think should resonate the most for Garmin:. So now, when we face a choice between adding features and resolving security issues, we need to choose security. Our products should emphasize security right out of the box, and we must constantly refine and improve that security as threats evolve.

While other country support desks such as the US and UK are really good about handling customers. Next, and perhaps most importantly is a team that has ship-blocking authority within Garmin. Meaning, right now the decision for whether or not a product or firmware version ships is within the product team itself. But Garmin has consistently proven — product after product, year after year — that those software development teams are incapable of judging that bug bar.

No different than Apple or Samsung, Microsoft or Facebook. But, the goal threshold needs to be moved up. Right now that acceptance gate is either too low, or too short in duration to be catching the issues people are seeing. That team needs autonomy from product group organizational charts to act as a bit of a backstop for customers, and also support.

And I know that this sounds easy on paper and is hard to execute in practice. It simply starts with organizational direction from the top of the company. Once that ball starts rolling, a cultural shift can occur. But it can happen. It took Microsoft years for that organization shift to occur around security albeit in a vastly larger and more complex company , but the fundamental building blocks are not terribly different than what is outlined above.

After all, their Fitness and Outdoor divisions financially speaking are doing better than ever. The company is selling more units than ever before. Be it the obvious ones like Apple which has arguably carved out new market areas , but also to Wahoo in the cycling realm. Just like my tweet a week ago with swimming frustrations would be easy Twitter fodder, but it shows that some 59, people saw it, and more importantly: 13, people were interested in it enough to actually look at the images.

And the reality is that every product is different — and more importantly, so are the alternatives. The reality is that for my specific requirements, Garmin generally ticks all the boxes better than most other products. Or unless I actually saw that specific issue during my review time-frame such as the case with the upcoming MARQ review. What I hope Garmin takes away from this is that consumers want the company to do better.

They are just asking for the things they want to buy or have bought to work consistently from Day 1. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked. If you would like a profile picture, simply register at Gravatar , which works here on DCR and across the web. Subscribe me to the newsletter. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can click here to Subscribe without commenting. Thanks for bringing this issue to the fore, Ray.

I just ignore it. Of course they extensively tested the most difficult GPS task when they changed the GPS chipset in their multisport watches. A class-action lawsuit for their false advertising is in order and maybe we can hope that something like that would drive a cultural change in the company.

Does anyone know a lawyer who likes to eat low hanging fruit? When you say Garmin, with a lack of relevant data, you might want to emphasise you mean the Fitness division. Unlike Wahoo they do a whole lot more than bike stuff. Perhaps they could learn from one another? Next race will require the F so I can be sure I will get the race data. So, again, long time Garmin customer who will happily even eagerly jump elsewhere given something close to good from someone else.

Garmin Italy is inexistent. I have had a new watch from garmin that has the same old problems. I am not able to make sync via wifi with more routers and nobody cares. Here some of them:. I was a loyal Garmin customer and owned a bunch of Garmin products, but around two years ago the growing frustration over a myriad of software issues and no feeling there was a light at the end of the tunnel caused me to throw in the towel. I switched to competing products with more reliable software and the trade off has been well worth the switch.

A few years ago I actually even wrote a similar post to yours and the Garman forums, and incredibly Garmin removed it. There was no harsh language or insults, just a call to arms for Garmin to get its software act together. Anyone passionate about sports equipment should be rooting for Garmin to succeed. Per my facebook comments, I have an Edge The only way to go back is to lock the screen then unlock it which takes you back to the main menu.

Garmin also adds things to their software which reduces usability. For example, Garmin Connect on my iPhone has a graph that shows both resting heartrate and maximum heartrate for every day. Maximum heartrate is not very interesting, but resting heartrate is and more precisely; the trend in resting heartrate.

But the trend in resting heartrate is not visible because the scale of the graph is from 30 to because they also show maximum heartrate, and my resting heartrate is tipical between 40 and Now resting heartrate is shown as a almost flat line, while in reality there is more fluctuation. To me, Garmin is a company driven by marketing.

And to be honest: it works! And to be even more honest, I did chose a Forerunner 2 years ago because my favorite brand, Suunto, made a mess with the Spartan. I have had only garmin for many years. When my Forerunner dies I will go back to Suunto.

Also not perfect, but 2 Suunto watches gave me less irritation than 1 Garmin watch. At least I learned a lesson: The jealous making feature list of Garmin is not something that makes you happy at the end. I question whether Garmin employees actually use Garmin devices? If they do surely they would push their company harder to get things right before releasing? Nailed it! I spent all this money and I just want the basic features to work flawlessly; I want my money back.

Little confused by this article. Almost every other commentator cites their gripe with Garmin and yet in your own link to dcrainmaker. Those three items are specific tipping points. I currently use an Edge And this creates an enormous support burden for the company. Garmin Connect is a perfect example. Look at all the posts about Bluetooth connectivity not working.

Bluetooth works most of the time with some fiddling. Garmin, hire a Human Factors Team and build a solid User interface before shipping the first product. FR elevation smoothing that caused massive under-reporting of total ascent 3. Vivoactive 3 rapid battery drain when powered off. FR OHR cracked resin twice 2. Vector 3 battery cover debacle. Edge touchscreen failing. But like a lot of people on here, I get sucked into the new product hype, with the hope that this new device could be the one that Garmin gets right.

Thanks for what you do. And if that fixes things, then the next week or two is a great time to do some openwater swimming outside the DCR Cave. Both in the context of internal Garmin discussions, but probably also amongst the media. Maybe some of the media will bring it up. It sounds like James for CyclingTips had interviews with Garmin around this topic last week.

I have always felt you are just renting a device from Garmin, they never seem to support a product after two years. Bugs or no bugs you just have to live with it or buy a newer more expensive device…. Their phone service in the UK is good…. Would I trust them…. NO WAY. Their software is not stable. I have lost rides on a once in a lifetime tour across the alps.

I now know how to use file fixer and rely on Strava to fix and save files…. Garmin connect is simply a conduit because so many files are not on there. In other words it was unstable software again. Oh and have you ever tried to plot a route on garmin…. I can show you a hill in the English Chilterns that you cannot ride up because garmin has not discovered that you can actually cycle underneath a railway line. Thank you for this article. As others have said, the more the devices costs, the greater the likelihood of issues, for some reason.

This meant that any CIQ data field which displayed lap stats which have to be calculated by the app would display nonsense during a workout, leading to unhappy users. When they finally designed to fix it, they did it in such a way that: all affected apps would have to be modified and resubmitted, and that the fix only applied to new devices. So none of this is a coincidence, IMO. Something else that I do not understand at all. Is that so hard for garmin to make a dropdownbox to chose which version to install?

Is that so hard to make an firmware area that contains all the user configurations like alerts, page fields and so on, so if I install the new firmware and test for garmin in a watch pay by me, everything becomes more light for the user? Try it yourself — sit on a park bench for a minute — seems to generate 60 data points in the. FIT file. If you have a powermeter sensor attached, it will always be 1 second. AFAIK the smart setting is ignored if you are using power.

Correct, power meters always force it to 1-second recording. All it does is increase customer confusion. My fenix 3 is a dog. I keep it up to date, have reasonable config options, etc. I suspect that might also be true with the fenix 5 sensor connectivity issue. Is this a bad unit that I can swap? Is this ideal? Not really! This company will disappear once known its software and hardware problems and its null intention to solve them over the years.

Is this normal? Is this a serious company? Play for years the same problems without the slightest intention to solve them?. I have owned most of Garmin Edges since the and they constantly get worse, even at their basic functions, recording a ride reliably.

After this weekends event, where my crashed at the 69 mile check point. Hi Ray. You pulled my comment from the Edge review. I may be at fault, but definitely not fake ;. In fact I called Garmin customer service yesterday who were very nice but provided the very same solutions as un re -pairing bluetooth, ensuring Garmin Connect app was updated; and then re-syncing edge and Garmin connect.

Unfortunately, I am writing today to report that the end result remains the same. This is quite an interesting observation. Not just the article in itself but the comments here as well. I have become used to always having two computers because one of them is regularly crashing or doing something odd. The crashes in and of themselves are annoying but the resulting practice of riding with two devices is actually really nice.

Hit it right on the head Ray. People that are this interested in tracking their workouts and data associated with said workouts are not stupid. I love Garmin but they will lose me to other products that just work as promised. Thanks for the honest article. I will wait and consider products like Bryton and Stages L Thanks again! Absolutely nailed it. Have a look. My Bolt was setup in 30s, and used without any issue at all for nearly a year. The Garmin?

It took 15 minutes just to get the app to sync even though my phone connected fine and I still have to deal with this BS instability. My introduction to Garmin ecosystem was last years Edge , which for the most part has done what I need it to. Is that it? Is this EOL for this product in terms of attention from their development team? Two years is about par for the course, although they abandoned the Epix in about one. I was planning to get a as soon as available but maybe not now.

Better the devil I know. My Wahoo Bolt has some irritating quirks and has stopped navigating mid ride, but the rides were saved by up loading to Strava. It drops my HR and cadence, and does not connect to my phone consistently…but it has never lost a ride. Do I want to lose the relative stability of the Bolt to get the cool features of the ? Some years ago, I sell my horrible Garmin Edge in favor of a wahoo Bolt.

Honestly, can anyone give me a recent non Garmin watch which can replace the Forerunner ? Polar Vantage is terrible gps and hrm and that is the same for the current Suunto models… I even went back to my 5 year old Polar V… It seems that, as technology evolves, the electronic devices are getting worse but the prices are goung up way high…. Thank you so much for putting this out there! I so hope that Garmin gets the hint! I have just given up on things like LiveTrack and this BT thing is just pitiful.

I was also part of the E fiasco and even gave them a chance to make up for it by giving me a discount on the if I send them their junk back…nope! Hello Wahoo! Great post. When I got my cycling computer a couple of years ago, I was scared off to Polar V because of the buggy Edges in my surroundings. Sure, it lacked in features, but the only thing I still really miss is smartphone notifications.

So now when I was after a new watch, I was again looking at Garmin, but was again scared off due to reading about all the software issues, but there was another factor as well: the sheer amount of Garmin watches out there with just one or two features difference. You only mention their wearables here, but was a disaster of a year for their Wahoo Kickr Snaps as well.

We bought 12 Snaps, and ended up replacing 14 of them before requesting a refund, which is still ongoing. Defective Snaps were replaced with used defective Snaps. If you want to show your location to friends and loved ones forget garmin and strava. Just use Google maps share location feature.

The reason most people prefer to use LiveTrack when it works , is that it offloads the GPS work to the device so it saves battery on the phone since GPS is the biggest battery draw after the display. Again, when it works. Am I really? I started with the Forerunner , then , xt, Fenix 3 HR, and most recently, the I got replacement units and I was happy with them. But then, I got the new Man, total shit show! I had to return it mushy buttons, poor battery life and unreliable syncing.

In my opinion, those issues are unacceptable. Considering the is built on top of the , they had more than two years to figure out the issues. I owned the Garmin Edge and as well as several Forerunners and sensors before growing frustrated with their unreliability. I moved to Wahoo and never looked back. Even as a customer this is visibly present at Wahoo. When there are bugs they are quickly identified and resolved. There were plenty of bugs when I bought an ELEMNT upon its initial release, but a few months of regular upgrades later and platform stability was rock solid, all the bugs driven to ground by persistent attention.

I take that as a reassuring sign that another bug or edge-case has been knocked before I will ever have to encounter it. I have owned a a number of Garmin products including an eTrex, an Oregon , an Edge , an Edge and a couple watches including the FR I even bought an Index scale that crapped out on me within 90 days.

It would return a weight I knew to be about 20 pounds too light. After alerting Garmin of the problem they eventually allowed me to return it in exchange for another refurbished Index which has been fairly reliable for the past 18 months or so. My FR 15 had to be returned and exchanged for another refurbished unit and it has worked as expected for about five years as long as I keep the battery meter showing full power.

My Edge would auto-pause only when the activity history was empty. All-in-all a reliable unit for me. I upgraded to the because I wanted the LiveTrack feature and It worked more or less as advertised up until I started reading about the failures other folks were having with it. After being off the bike for a few months I got the LiveTrack failure notice for the first time a couple weeks ago.

This blog has kept me informed of the quirks my Garmin products may experiance so I definately do not feel alone. I guess I just put up with them and lower my expections. I wonder how Garmin actually does its software testing. What is the test strategy? Does it use continuous integration? Does it use automatic testing? And since many of the software issues seem to appear in existing functionality, what about regression testing strategy? I find that the only way to keep a good quality in complex pieces of software like this is to go for the combination of CI, automatic tests and of course automatic regression tests.

Then virtually all tests can be repeated regularly — as often as possible, ideally with every commit or pull request — so that problems in that existing functionality are found quickly. It is a bit of an investment to start going down this route, but it is worth it. I used to say about my that it was proof that nobody at Garmin actually uses the products they make. I definitely have a love hate relationship with Garmin.

Have you communicated to anyone at Garmin directly? I communicate with them constantly. Also, there are quotes in the piece from their head of the Fitness division which is roughly one stop away from the CEO, there may be a dotted line in there to someone else in between, but basically the quotes I have are from the top of the fitness world.

As noted, in some markets it was just a handful of percent. Again, just a swag. For example, ignoring things like older Garmin units — an Edge , and only comparing the market-share from the timeframe the BOLT came out. I did consider reverse engineering those. I just assumed Garmin had gotten its act together in the years since I got my xt. The Timex Global Trainer, which debuted almost 10 years ago, let you set up the watch and customize everything on a computer.

All you had to do was drag and drop on your computer, then sync the watch and the changes would appear. Garmin is 10 years behind Timex. Garmin need to be open with tickets, their transparency is pretty opaque on issues. Leaving them unable to innovate quickly or fix bugs in a timely manner. Thanks Ray, Yes, market share breakdown of similar current product would be useful. For example: link to marketwatch. Good to know that Garmin is starting to address ease-of-use.

Yesterday I rode with a user, and their eyes bugged out when I described Elemnt setup, management and usage workflows. I hope Wahoo Chip and Murray are monitoring this — stability and ease-of-use are their crown jewels. Edge stopped calculating distance after I activated the bike alarm feature. Also it just from after I paused a ride only 5 minutes in! Ray, your article released a firestorm of pent up Garmin frustration.

Your stance was fair, neutral and painfully accurate. Hopefully Garmin will turn all of the negative experiences into a positive reset of priorities. Here is my Garmin history dating back to my first watch, XT in An amazing watch for its time, too big to wear everyday, but it turned every mountain bike ride into an insightful workout. Excellent watch but a very short life of just over a year. I went back to Suunto for the Spartan Wrist HR, but was very disappointed, so I came back to Garmin for the , which is to date, my favorite watch.

Both had battery issues that were never resolved, even with replacement units. During that time I bought an Instinct for my son, who loves it. During the past few years I have also been very pleased with my Apple Watch 2,3 and now 4 as a daily driver and surprisingly consistent fitness watch.

And now, after reading about so many frustrating issues, I am unable to pull the trigger on a new For me, the fills all my needs, and I have only had occasional software glitches over the past few years. I am happy with my Garmin watch, but I have no confidence in buying new products. A sincere thanks to Ray for his commitment to all of us, and to everyone who shares their experiences on this site. The last two updates to the app completely destroyed the link with my Fenix 5 Plus.

I had to go through unlinking, disconnect bluetooth, rejoin to my profile. Next day I run a 5k with my kids in about 36 min I typically run 21 min and have in the past with this watch. It is stunning how reliably bad the customer experience is.

Ray: Your editorial on Garmin product reliability was spot on. Live tracking is virtually worthless. Every time I attempt to use it my wife worries because it never works. While both the and look enticing, I am looking closely at the new Wahoo Roam for exactly the reasons you state in the editorial; namely, stability of product and willingness to correct software bugs quickly.

If you want to charge top price, then the consumer should expect top of the line functional reliability. Thanks for posting this Ray — This has been the state for so long. No only is their software so poor, bugs run rampant.. They show no signs in investing to leap ahead of any potential competitors. Wahoo still fall short IMO on a lot of features if you like gadgetry like Varia radar — but it appears from my limited use and commentary from people I ride with, the Wahoo devices are far better and simpler if you just need a ride recorder.

Better screen? That depends on what you want. For cycling or for cross country skiing, I want an always on screen that can easily be seen in direct sunlight. If Garmin had even a shred of innovative ability or sourced the right components they could easily make a product relevant in modern times… But they choose to hover back about years in technology for no reason other then they are poorly managed.

Garmin sent me a new USB cable. Since my was then still under warranty, Garmin replaced it under warranty. Tried different USB cords. No joy. I even tried plugging my into a phone charger just to see if I could get it charged up and theoretically still use and just transfer rides to Strava via BT.

Essentially bricked. I countered with how about an since I knew the had just been released. I read on the web about at least few other people with the same experience. Did make me laugh when Garmin released a dive computer ….. Ray, I really appreciate you writing this article but I hasten to add that until this point you have always come across to me as a bit of a Garmin fan boy — other than a notable Edge review some years back.

I started off with a Geko many years ago and now the family has many different devices. Today I have a as a daily driver, old Edge , scales bombproof to be fair and lots of other family devices and sensors. Personally Strava is the go to app, but I do like Garmin Connect which definitely ties me in somewhat to the Garmin ecosystem. But what has really fried my piss are my Vector 3s.

What a useless bit of expensive kit. I waited until they had the physical update with the battery doors and then took the plunge. Your Marq might not do OWS but at least it tells the time! The UK aftersales has been appalling. I really hope some other player can build an alternative to this niche monopoly provider who takes us all for granted — the market has to find a solution.

PS made me chuckle the comment about Edges powering up when they are unplugged. End game with Garmin CS is always a hard reset, yep lose everything and start again. I just gotbfed up with faults, more faults, fixes that made things worse, and actually garbage suport. So does my wife on a totally different device and problem. I want the basics to work well. Polar have been a revelation in comparison… they reply to emails and tell me what they are doing.

They sorted a hardware just a strap simply with 2 short emails, and a replacement was in my letter box within a couple of days. Garmin… radio silence quite often. And definitely tracks Open water far better than my 2 previous garmin multisport watches when tried back to back. One thing that Garmin is awesome at is supporting old hardware.

I still have my old — and it still uploads to Garmin Connect over a decade later. That thing came out when the PlayStation 2 and Gamecube were still the big video game consoles. I replaced my Edge with a Wahoo Bolt. The case is cheap plastic that scratches if you look at it wrong.

Wahoo also has issues with mounts breaking on the new Roam and buttons falling off older Bolts. Then you look at their software platform. The reality is that the Wahoo platform is essentially middleware. All of these software platforms have free versions, but if you want to get the most out of your device, you need to pay extra each month.

Meanwhile, Garmin Connect, while not perfect, has all of those features there in a single place and is completely free. You talk about releasing a product before the software is ready? Coros — Newcomer with a product line all over — personally not sure if they will be around in years. Almost Kickstarter like. Also one of the things was a bit offputting was one of the requests was for being able to follow a course on a bike ride. Weird stance to take, IMHO. Replaced by Garmin twice Vivoactive 3 — generally OK until it just permanently locked up.

Replaced battery. Threw it in the bin Edge — my least irritating Garmin until Garmin introduced the battery drain bug which rendered it essentially useless Fenix 3 — bought it for MTB riding but randomly dropped sensors, particularly power Stages Edge — useless touch screen. Battery issues have been deal breakers for me in the past as I do a lot long events. For Garmin to respond is much harder because they got lots of architectural and partnership baggage to deal with — big ships are difficult to turn.

Owned multiple Garmin devices currently the Fenix 5s Plus and I really like Garmin products and have had very few issues over the years. Very reliable recording of my workouts and the connectivity to TP and Strava just works.

I am a happy proponent of all things Garmin. Right on point. Besides Livetrack and bluetooth to Edge connectivity, Grouptrack is a train wreck. I still use Garmin but their attitude towards customer complaints is down right awful. The forums can be chuck full of the same issue and they deny any complaints about it at all. Specifically, the original Garmin Fenix and the Edge were a disaster. The Fenix 1?

Except for the period I was using the beta releases, it was rock solid for me. Altitude correction actually worked, GPS was fine, and the most amazing thing was not a feature at all, but probably just a mistake by Garmin: you could put maps on it? Mine had water ingress and had to be replaced, but it worked well for years. The Epix was OK except for the altitude offset bug that they never fixed. If you calibrated it it would display altitude correctly, and it always stayed more or less correct as you did an activity.

Then when you got home and got the FIT file off, the altitude was offset by it varied by user in my case ft high. Altitude correction never worked, so you had to calibrate it each time you used it. But it had real maps, and could sort of navigate with them getting it to do turn-by-turn was a chore, but route based navigation worked fine.

Without that, I would only see the same pattern as observed for all the other product lines — starting with an alpha version firmware, updating up to a beta level but not more. I still have my Oregon somewhere in a box, but the software did never get stable.

I would have expected a reliable small kernel app handling the information exchange e. Same effect have been seen years ago for the Training Center GTC — I sent tons of bug reports, but the unreliable design did never change at least Garmin modified the database at the end. The big question for me is, why Garmin was not able to bundle all energy to create a solid single firmware instance which runs on all watches? Just disabling a feature here and there? Adding a single different watchface for marketing reasons is okay, but supporting completely different codes for different products will not make Garmin great again….

Replacing the maps was the only solution to the problem, took me probably 8 hours to figure it out and resolve. I have the same issue with roundabout exits on my Edge Can you give me some details with which map you replaced the Garmin pre-installed stock map? Most popular site afaik is link to garmin. Because it was down over the weekend, I have used country maps Switzerland, Germany from link to alternativaslibres.

Worked without problems. I have used garmin. The other one works fine. Having only experienced owning an Index Smart Scale, Garmin VivoActive HR and then a ForeRunner M I would agree that they need to focus more on improving the stability of the software and helping make it easier for customers to report issues and receive responses.

I stay with Garmin because I am semi locked into the ecosystem with other family members and we actively share our runs etc between each other. I would also add that the Garmin Connect Mobile App iOS needs a lot more work to make it more user friendly, fix notifications and generally just improve it. Beep, beep, beep …. Beep, beep, beep,….

In the paper of your home page was written that I can request the full refund. I bought the watch 3 days ago. How can I do? But nobody can make a refund. Within the EU you have the right to return any product you deem defective within 14 days, to the trade store you bought it from. I asked to garmin that tells to me to speak with the store that sold the watch. The store sends the watch back to garmin and garmin sends a new one. The problem for me is the same. I have the new watch from less than two weeks but I think nobody refunds me any more.

Who refunds me? The store or garmin? To whom should I request a refund? I bought the watch at 25 of aprile. The watch after 10 days goes to the assistance for more than 4 weeks on may, I take the new one from the sender the 3 of june. I do not know if I can have a full refound today.

Thanks for this post! I would suggest that reporting an issue should be easier than going to a web site and filling out something, although that is worthwhile. They do not care! The problem of the interaction of the Edge and Edge Remote they solved 1. From October !!! Everyone saw the quality of the soldering and fabrication of the Edge device for euros. When will it get done … my guess is never.

I think Garmin must have known you were writing it though, and is that why they deleted all the forum posts for legacy devices! When I talked with them about the forum transition back in April in the context of the Tacx acquisition forums, they agreed that having all that old data was incredibly useful for support. They broke all the old URLs, which affects bookmarks and search results. There were useful threads in those subforums, like convos about training and VO2 Max.

You know what? If someone has that problem in the future, maybe Garmin can help them. Do they even care about user-to-user for current devices? They look completely unusable. I love my Garmin stuff and think they are the best. Invariably I will lose connection with all and in worse case scenario, the will shut down completely. I have had issues with several Garmin Edge computers, and usually unhelpful support.

My died and all I have got is a shrug and buy another, I think not. I liked it and having owned a few know how to work it. It is time for a Wahoo I think. Thanks extremely good post!! Suunto is out of question because really bad experience with their support, even though I speak their native language.

Polar is lacking saphire glass from latest vantage V titan, otherwise that would fill all the ticks in my list. If you want a multisport watch, a good garmin may be an old model. I have my Forerunner XT that works good , openwater, pool, running, cycling, mtb so in the forest under trees and so on.

Also the battery life is good enough after 4 years of life. Do not buy a new model. Already using xt, it works fine when not broken. This is 3rd unit in 2 years. And I would prefer something more robust but still good looking watch. Suunto had good hardware, but the server connectivity problems were never solved. When I send to Suunto support Wireshark log where I can see that their server is not working correctly, they replied to check the cable between watch and computer and then stopped replying.

I have had 2 FRXT. The first one I sanded back after 5 days of use it was a new entry on gamin , than I re buy the same watch after a year and it was like another watch. No significant bugs, solid updates and so on. So I think depends on use but for me is a very good product.

I got mine a few months ago. Route navigation worked well for me in trails too. Strava live segment is new to me but I think it has been working fine. They have consistently been measured 0. Unfortunately my FR was equally bad the other week though.

I think this might be a firmware problem as last year, my FR said my m intervals were 1. After reboot on the pool results 6h of activity after 20 min of real swim. Garmin sends me a new watch but I am pretty sure that the problem is not only mine. For the rest, the temperature sensor of this watch is realy stupid. If you take the watch on your wrist like every normal person did, it signs something between air temperature and body temperature something realy unuseful.

The only thing that makes me to do the upgrade fron FRXT is the music. It works fine for me and with the music my pace goes down about 30s ;. I realy hope they fix the wifi problem. If my router works fine I would never have noticed the problem, but this is realy bad. Many peaple have problems with the altimeter, another regression of a bug on fenix3 fixed a year ago, and so on. I hope the Garmin execs. Upon finishing the ride the ride data is automatically uploaded to GC without me touching my phone.

I really hope Garmin will get their act together. After reading this article yesterday I switched on my at the start of a training session based on power and found all my customised data fields had disappeared and some random ones in their place. My only recorded about m of my Ironman I spent the first minutes of the run trying to unfreeze it and gave up and then I heard a beep and looked down and it was re-booting and then started working where it had left off apart from a wonky T2 transition time.

Yes, there are some bugs but most of them got solved. Recognizing this is not the most complex unit either. But it generally does what it needs to do. Integration with CIQ Komoot app works well planning routes.

Yes it sometimes takes a while for the device to recognize the phone and connect. They have the money, people and board to push these things forward. And you already see the 1st signs of that: dedicated app store for the AW. Platform and money, but probably not the desire. If Apple wanted to, they could simply buy Garmin and clean up the software act. And it not a bad device, but it certainly IS as buddy as the other Edge series — Livetrack not working most rides, losing connectivity to my iPhone, rerouting not working properly if you go off a course, etc.

Good one…. I also hope that Garmin will take something from that post…it would be much appriciated action…:. Edge user for about 5 years and Vivoactive HR for about 1 year. My Edge tracks Total Ascent perfectly and accurately.

I was sent a Garmin link to make an improvement suggestion. Rule number 1 in any support situation is to show an understanding of an issue being reported. That sounds like a typical GPS number. Barometric altimeters should have a few feet of precision. The altimeter in this Fenix 5 is every bit as accurate as the one in the Edge when the altitude is manually set at the start of a ride.

The Edge does it from pre loaded altitudes and when you ride from home it is a brilliant system, now introduced in the Fenix 5 Plus as an improvement. Garmin asked for a pair activities Edge and Fenix 5 on the same ride that showed the issue, and when they compared them, said they were effectively identical. When I pointed out that it was pointless to use GPS data to compare altitudes, I was guided to look at the same barometer troubleshooter link again.

Wahoo support is just as bad if not worse for understanding the issue. At least with garmin you get a chance to escalate you have to do it through email and it takes a while so you have a chance of your issue getting addressed. The Edge is the dated file. Both had auto cal on. They only concern about the bottom line. With Garmin dominates the market share, they still think buggy devices still make the sale.

They could have been made even more sales if they fix their bug. The changes have to happen from the top management. And I think those C levels guy in Garmin has been living rich for too long. Eg A US is on 7. Maybe you should research and add that to your article. Man, I thought this was overblown, or maybe people were doing things wrong a lot, or maybe that the new would be great.

Finally left my Powertap LYC behind and moved to the future present? The second two both had my phone disconnect. So I forced that and it connected, but then I got the Strava database error when I opened the app.

Luckily I knew the route, but it still prevented me from getting my ETA listed. This is all with 3. For this price it is unacceptable but not a surprise from Garmin. But: the bugs, oh the bugs. Every software version has introduced catastrophic crashing bugs, recording activity bugs in which the unit just crashes at random.

Yes, it can. No, junk in, junk out! The elevation is off due to no barometer, but it corrects this in GoldenCheetah just fine. In your case it would be easier to just contact your creditcard company who will send you a form to sign and will then refund you whilst disputing with the shop and Garmin.

My 70 year old rolex is still going strong and is an example of premium solid build. Well my last sat in the box unopened for 6 months. The other products have all been quirky, and some have had some real problems. I use Stages for a power meter, and it has been flawless for years. I use a Wahoo Element for a bike computer, and it too has been perfect. Great article.. As a long time Garmin product owner and fan currently the , and , but many before it! Garmin Edge Bluetooth to phone connectivity — yes I giggled — and for some of the comments too.

I think Garmin falls a bit short here on explaining this all to the layman — it could only take some clever and more diplomatic wording on their numerous pages about troubleshooting bluetooth issues to win over those unaware about the potential technological reasoning behind having to occasionally repair. Stay well away! Fully agreed your suggestions — change for a modern global ticketing system that will be HUGE cost so it could go up possibly to CEO level to sign that off , but reduce the range of devices and support lifecycle for those devices too.

If you use a look on the back at the OHR sensor. You may see internal cracks, weird looking marks or something may seem off. It WILL happen eventually if you use your watch in this way for the multi-sport function. If you spend most of your time in an office and only use the watch for the odd run the optical heart rate sensor may never crack — but I can assure you that in time it will break, generally within the first of ownership and doing a couple of the supported sports.

We need to educate the new high end watch users to look out for hardware issues, because there is clearly an inherent design flaw with the , and Fenix5 series. No thanks! Garmin should never have released them. The software updates are horrible.

Should have gone with a Wahoo computer and a Stages powermeter.. Now have two thathave troubles thanks to Garmin support. I would like to have one that works. Problem seems to be watch. For that reason Imdid not buy Vector. I took Favero Assioma instead. Worked with no problems from beginning. Now for almost two years. I have a few metrics less than with Vector. But it is reliable. For running I have Stryd and it works great, too. Face palm! There are 3 of us in our running group using the All 3 of us have started having charging issues in the last month.

Too much of a coincidence. Especially so soon after the introduction of new models. Coincidence or Apple like conspiracy?? I can feel the pull of the Wahoo cycling computers and it will probably be my next purchase. They seem more clean and intuitive.

The sheer number of comments shows how big issue it is for Garmin customers. Current smartwatches are starting to provide decent level of fitness and sport-tracking which might be not as good as Garmin is when it is working, but good-enough and BY FAR better smartwatch experience when it comes to this part Garmin is far-far behind Apple, WearOS, Samsung watches. Forerunner , edge plus, Vivomove hr, experience no issues, use Vivomove hr with edge plus with ant.

I have a feeling I have less problems since I never use foot pods, power meters or bike things, only external HR straps of various kinds. In GC it looks right. I know this is a old post, but curious did you ever find out the problem regarding the water temp? My Fenix 5 was swapped out 3 times by Garmin support for several reoccurring bugs before I finally just returned it to REI, where the customer service clerk mentioned I was definately not alone.

I then bought a Vivo 3, which was swapped out twice by Garmin support for altimeter issues before they recommended me paying to upgrade to FR After upgrading to the FR , I had to send it back to Garmin for a replacement, which came with the same Bluetooth connectivity issues as the first one had.

Garmin finally issued me a refund check. Reading this post and the comments has me thinking that I should return the Garmin for a Wahoo. Unlike Wahoo or Polar or Suunto. I went with Polar and it drove me crazy that I had to get my phone out to set the data pages or change something on the watch. With Polar I had to go get my phone. With Garmin I just did it while I was still running. See ya. But yes, Garmin is definitely in need of some serious quality control when it comes to releasing products with buggy software.

Get with the program Garmin. I own a Polar Vantage V and coming from three different Garmin devices Instinct, Fenix 5 and FR I miss having the option to customise the watch from the watch itself, or even customise the main pages widgets and some other stuff.

And reasonable accurate on the information coming from the sensors. It has never let me down. Basic feature available in old InReach devices. The 66i is also incapable of receiving weather reports via satellite. Again, something which is a feature on all previous InReach devices. In terms of InReach features, this supposedly flagship device is a step backwards! How can anyone be sitting on the Garmin product team think this is acceptable?

My usual experience with a new Garmin device is: unbox, find problem, try user forum, read manuals, call support line. Kudos to DC for writing this article — I wonder if Garmin will ever invite him again to a conference!

I am surprised Garmin has not made any comments — I assume that is because they agree with everything that is written? Anyway, I joined the no-Garmin movement — replaced the Vector 3 with 4iiii gravel bike — Quarq road bike — wahoo for edge and Suunto for Garmin watch. Everything works perfectly — not had any issues and the few times I have had some questions about any of these products I get a quick reply do not have to wait for days.

The only product I have used from Garmin is the Edge I have had it for three years or so and it works fine. Although I do have severe issues with Live Track, and also that I have to delete and re-pair the bluetooth connection regularly. I also have a date issue that sometimes happens. It sets the date totally wrong, so that the sync with Strava breaks, and I have to repair a fit file and upload manually.

Based on what what you wrote, it looks like im kot the only one then With specific examples. And yet, here they are 10 years later, doing better than ever. Go figure. Absolutely agree — generally they produce good hardware and poor software in my experience.

My Garmin Music is running software version 4. And yet 4. Perhaps Garmin should get on the reoccuring revenue bandwagon and sell annual support plans that offer more reliable bug fixes and product enhancements via firmware updates. Sure, Garmin makes good hardware with crappy software…but Wahoo makes products with ok hardware and good software.

Yes, Garmin sucks in their own unique way but, honestly, so does everyone else. Hi Ray. I can assure you that this article got the the right ears or should I say eyes. Unfortunately it got out the same way it got in. With a pathetic internal email that we are working towards something. Something that is terrible ineffective , slow and not low on the priority list.

Managers lack the knowledge on what is really going on deep down in Garmin or they do but they turn a blind eye. They have people in the development , business or QA cycle that have no idea what they are developing , analysing or testing. Garmin reported increased quarterly and yearly revenues from the fitness segment which negates any cry of help for things that go or went wrong during development or maintaining tasks and possible any change of making things better on the long run.

Managers only care for numbers. That is a stupid thing to do on the long term but some managers became managers not because they showed skill and knowledge but because they are long time Garmin employees and made some good friends. The entire Connect Web and Mobile ecosystem is rotten to the core. Management is more concerned in getting more and more features out the window with product quality always getting a second or third place. A cycle that will never end. That is the only way you are going to send a clear message to them that something needs to change.

If their revenues go up I am afraid you are still going to see the same story years from now. As I understand this is not the first critic Ray sent to Garmin t. Any improvements? Yeah thought so. Maybe they need to hire people that love what they do and not just wait their paycheck.

Maybe decide on fixing issues , maybe put a hold on writing new code and refactor the existing one , maybe provide more time for quality processes … maybe maybe maybe. The end result? The clever minds, the people how really care and really want, giving up. One by one. Bugs are one thing, feature regressions another.

This was a critical feature. Yet the regression came without warning, workaround or alternate workflow. I will only add that there are additional confounding software issues that literally leave me wondering how the good folks at Garmin think things through, or not. The inability to respond to text messages on the fly with an ios connected phone. Thus, the identity of the bike sensor is then burned into the head unit. When you upload a ride, instead of logging it related to the named sensor, and by extension the bike, it defaults to the default bike you have set up in Connect!?!?.

Yes, you can go in and edit the ride and change the bike — but you have to do that extra step. Why on earth would Garmin not at a minimum offer an option to use named sensor for upload default identification? It would be more user friendly then to accurately track the total mileage on each bike you use. For all the great mapping features which I truly appreciate and keep me a G customer , and to some degree extremely well-done software features, omission of a simple feature such as this that I suspect virtually everyone would appreciate is bizarre.

Pic of the named sensors — when you upload a ride it should automatically link to that bike in Connect, thus when you upload to Strava it can also have the correct bike selected may involve naming the sensor the same ID as your Strava bike ID, not sure about that though. Unfortunately for 1 iOS access to reply to text messages , that is actually legit on Apple. Android has no such limitation, which is why the feature works fine over there for Garmin users.

This impacts not just Garmin devices, but countless other watches. For example, Fitbit has the same limitation, and way back in the day so did Pebble. As for sensors — totally agree at least to the extent of Garmin Connect. Maybe one day…. This is absolutely an accurate review from a trusted authority.

The newer stuff is horrendous. On a recent ride my sent an incident notification to my wife. Incident detection was off!!! I received no notice on the or my watch and repeated calls and texts from my wife were not communicated to the watch or the Notifications to watch and did not transmit. The Bluetooth pairing with Apple and notifications do not work and incident detection is a awful.

Yeah you can go through all the steps turn off watch restart phone forget device from Bluetooth. But the software is broken. Why can upload but not send notifications. Hundreds of dollars worth of tech and I cannot get a simple message. So pleased to find this post, I thought that it was just me. This is a great watch when it works. Interesting about Live Track and Bluetooth pairing. Pairing works flawlessly.

I did crash once and the incident detection went off. My Garmin triggered an SMS to my wife with my location accurate , telling her there was an issue. It then left her number on the screen. When a driver who stopped to help asked who to call, I was too concussed to recite her number but did see it on my Garmin, so pointed to it saying to just call that number.

Not sure if this falls under the Live Tracking and Bluetooth pairing topic though. Oh yes, I have had mates track me. When I was riding in the Snowy Mountains, I shared tracking in a WhatsApps group each day and I was getting message popping up on my Garmin from people in the group, talking about where I was on climbs etc.

Just my experience. Garmin is working to address the livetracking issues brought up here, through a pretty significant effort and a bit of redesigning of things that will also carry back to older devices. Expect more on that later this fall. Oh great. Go Garmin! Talk about over delivering. A little side note there. Fall which is Autumn which is March to May. Garmin Fall, so, Kansas Fall. No relation to Wizard of Oz Fall. They had a reputation for a long time as being among the worst actually when it was all outsourced to elsewhere in Asia.

Anyway, the point I am making is using seasons is not a good universal solution to giving time frames. I hear you use season on the podcast and I then assume you mean northern hemisphere and then I try to convert it and….. So Garmin Au support was not good in the past? Well from my recent experience, they are improved massively.

You hit the nail on the head with OW swim tracking. When I first got my Fenix 5 it was so much better than it is now. I did a training swim in the spring and probably covered yards. It tracked me at and showed much of it up into the grass and road adjacent to the lake. Oddly, yesterday I failed to start my watch before plunging into the water for a swim leg of a triathlon. I started the Fenix 5 in triathlon mode while I swam. The final track for the swim was nearly perfect.

How does that happen? My Edge is getting replaced by Garmin due to ongoing phone disconnection issues with no fixes working. Backlight control worked but nothing else. Not a good start for a brand new product is anyone but users doing QA these days…. Bluetooth pairing setup was a breeze though, except that full sync failed every time, until it started to work although I had already rebooted both devices plus re-pair a bit earlier to no available. I noticed recently that the problem is not actually endemic to Garmin.

Much like my body, but I digress. Anyhow, for once it was the recent Garmin devices that were more solid. Of course, Strava was another matter. More often than not Strava failed spectacularly importing long rides. They are in many ways the Microsoft of the industry. As a result, stability gets lost. I started off with an Elemnt Bolt which was a great bike computer. Is it perfect? But the idiosyncrasies of the Wahoo ecosystem seem far, far easier to deal with than the Garmin one.

Basically, the whole industry is suffering to some degree with a lack of design insight. Everything is about compromise in one way or another. Kind of sucks really. So now that varia radar is compatible with some Wahoo GPS, link to dcrainmaker. I completely agree with you!! These devices worked great until last year. My peak of frustation was yesterday suddenly my Garmin Vivoactive HR had error issue Sept 6th, and it was not the first time.

FYI, since January I tried to attain 60 days badges point but always experienced this issue when I got days and I had to start from 0 day again yesterday should be my 57th day to attain 60 days badge. It had been 5 times for God sake!! Finally I have enough and time to let go my Garmin devices after being a Garmin loyalist for 10 years.

Bye, Garmin!! I have disappointed so many times I am seriously considering alternatives to Garmin. I just hated to spend tens of hours with reinstalling software and fixing issues. It is not like Apple is perfect, far from that. But the same with Garmin.

I never wanted to know which file contains the error logs on my Garmin device. But I do know. And I have spent so many hours with setting up my watch after a hard reset. Because you CANT save all the settings. It worked fine for the first week or so — although the syncing to phone over bluetooth never really worked to be honest.

But then things got worse. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks for your fantastically informative website and posts! My wife has had issues with her Fenix 5S lately, essentially erratic HR behavior. We have tried side by side with and older edge 25 and results are very obvious. Garmin tech support has been terrible. It has taken over 48 hrs to get responses, and now that finally they agreed that unit may be faulty they only notified us that unit had arrived after posting literally 1 week after that watch was delivered.

We are 3 weeks counting… unit with them… no response. Much higher expectations for such a high priced item. This is Garmin Australia. I have to agree. I have had issues with multiple Fenix and Forerunner models. My current watch Fenix 5 plus is now giving me problems with the map it draws of my runs. When I upload to Connect, it puts the lap makers in the right spot but draws the red line wrong, as if it lost track of me for miles of my 10 mi run.

Is there some other trick to searching and clicking through? Talk about a hatchet job. This latest update on the Fenix 6x Pro basically bricked the connectivity and music of the device. I would return my Fenix, but it was a gift. Is there an alternative that also has music? The 6X firmware is apac now a month old with no pacepro, now default power modes for activities, no optical hr for swimming etc. With some heavy marketing done for those, why is such significant difference in version between regions is hard to comprehend.

Thanks for sharing this. I got a new one and turned off auto-updates. All works under 3. Disconnects, cut outs, you name it. Wonders if they did any real world testing outside of AI Simulators. But no answers on all of the problems. FYI, the new update 4. The smart buyer will avoid these updates and stick with what came with the watch, turn auto-updates off.

I might be wrong, but after reading your Garmin reviews, I believe to understand that Garmin have separate development teams for each product. My reflexion might be naive, but that would mean to me that every team would implement the same thing and each time reinvent the wheel. As time went by and processors became more powerful, instead of cleaning up the code and have a good base, they just added features to the mess that they inherited from themselves.

Inevitably the day will come or already came where it becomes impossible to master the beast that they created. To me this becomes apparent with the fact that many seem to agree with, that each firmware update fixes one thing but breaks to others. As I said, I hope this will not happen, but in the end of the day my money goes to the best product.

And I believe it will be easier for other companies to catch up with hardware quality than it will be for Garmin to keep the edge on the software side. But these days these teams are highly integrated and share features modules specifically between them far more deeply than ever before. Sure, sometimes it can be — but mostly not.

But you also want the flexibility to grab those modules and pull them in. Like we saw recently with the Fenix 6 getting a bunch of the new Vivoactive 4 features. Then, those features were added back in after they had been announced on Vivo. Making a bike computer is hard. Making a watch in is infinitely harder, and getting harder with a higher by by the month. This article and all the comments have me considering a return on the unopened Edge sitting on my stairs in a box from Garmin.

I might just stick to tracking rides on my old Cyclo and Fenix 1, both of which have zero reliability issues. Hi Ray, it is already a couple of months ago that this post triggered a lot of reactions. Except one: a reaction of Garmin itself. Did I miss that? Or was there really no reaction? I would also be interested to know if Garmin responded in any way.

I think many long-term Garmin customers are waiting for some sign that Garmin is learning and committed to improvement. Sorry to hear about having problems. Not sure what problems you have with the iOS app either, mine has worked well. Instead, the discussions have mostly been around specific issues I discussed:. And then some minor tangential quality related stuff briefly touched on above with specific issues. In the case of openwater swimming for example, Garmin did seem to react pretty strongly in terms of fixing the issues.

That same update has already hit other Garmin watches too. It sounds like there were some simpler fixes that were made, and then a longer list of changes being made behind the scenes that was going to take some time. They admitted there was no point in telling me about that until they were sure they nailed it. Which, I think is sorta the thing I said in my post above: Nothing Garmin can say will convince me.

They simply have to do. They have to get better at quality. And finally — for bits like not adding new firmware features to old watches — I think that certainly is valid to an extent. Garmin adds more features to older devices than any other company — period. One only need to look at the Edge to see that, or even the Fenix 5 firmware logs.

Where it rubs people the wrong way is bits like the training load aspects you noted. I am really angry about Garmin information policy. I have a Fenix 5 with unusable OWS. My very old XT is much better. I tested that with both watches on both hands. Now you write Garmin has learned and made a great swimming watch. Even the xt was a great swimming watch. But there is no information if there will be a Fenix 5 update. Or if I have swimming crab.

The 8. GCM was fine until Garmin updated about 2 weeks ago. Mine loses the ability to sync all the time, weather is broken. Let along the problems the newest firmware and sensor hub caused with the WHR. What I was curious about was, frankly, whether anyone there had ever acknowledged the general thrust of your article — namely that their increasing software instability is a ticking time bomb for their market share.

As you say, actions would speak louder than words, but failure to recognise problems usually indicates that solutions will not be forthcoming. I heard reports of issues but it seems that after the early updates to iOS everything with Garmin was working fine.

Then Garmin released 4. No activity sync, no weather, no ability to log in to music services, etc. They had reps on their users forums jumping in to blame Apple for the notifications change which is, as you say, totally on Apple whenever anyone suggested it was a Garmin problem.

I have to categorically disagree with you about Garmin adding more features to older devices. In fact, I think Apple has a much more demonstrable track record of introducing new software features to devices capable of them over a much longer period of time. I would also argue the reason the Edge devices seem to have benefitted more than the watches is because there is genuine competition there with the Wahoo devices.

I might not agree with it, but it would be what it is. Likewise silly things like Intensity Minutes. Have one Garmin device with that feature, it will work. And after eventually speaking on Friday to a senior manager in Garmin U. Having to wait until I get home after work to plug in and sync activities for a couple of weeks, meh who cares. If Garmin had been open and up front as soon as they knew they had a major issue, it would have occupied my brain for minutes at most. Genuinely that saddens me because they do make fantastic hardware.

But the software issues highlighted by Ray, and more importantly the lack of trust, really more than out weigh that. Yeah, 2 weeks ago is probably when your phone updated to iOS I do agree with you though on communications. For adding features to devices, I think the challenge is comparing to Apple every time. Apple mostly cares about your revenue via phones and now services.

In any case, check out the Fenix 5 firmware listing as a good example of just how many things have been added. And sometimes a single line item is really like 10 features behind the scenes. Yes, the banner is there. But absolutely none of the steps they offer fix the new issues introduced in 4. They know that 4. That banner you reference was up there before this release.

As you say, it would be easy for them to contact affected customers and warn them not to waste time trying to fix things. Those are just examples, but can anyone possibly justify it? Blaming Apple? For what? Garmin has the chance to solve the bugs for lots of months. Many people where complaining about the bad state already in the beta. Answer: This is a beta version. It will be fixed on time with the ios 13 release.

Guess what, the big problem was not fixed. Sync breaks again, and no weather. Ok, we are going on 3 weeks now with GCM being broken. Along with a slew of serious problems across all product lines with the device firmwares. I have honestly never seen things so bad. There is absolutely no excuse for the lack of communications, disconnect between the support people and the programmers, and quality of the programming. Do you have a Garmin support ticket?

I uploaded photos using GCM after my ride, and it worked fine. Interesting article… Garmin has a lot of software instabilities. Is there someone who has a license of the fit file repair tool and can help me recover a fit file from a garmin device?

Greetings Kristof. Thank you for your spot on article. Thought i was the only one having issues. I programme my workouts on Garmin App. Help center can not figure it out too. They can not help. It is frustrating and i am looking into other watches now.

Thank you. It just works and works well. I really wanted a rugged watch, but this experience with my Fenix 6x Pro has been horrible, utterly horrible. Just completely unstable. Garmin has gone downhill by a large margin in the past few years.

My Fenix 3HR was fantastic, so I decided to give them a try again. Sorry I did. Also the start stop and pause can be tough as they are not buttons. That said, in every other way, the AW is a more sophisticated device. Also the sensors are significantly more sensitive and GPS often better minus the trade mark Apple smoothing.

Not so much fashion, but sports and outdoor type. Rather than use glass or composite they use plastic, so it cracks after some exposure to normal cool and warm temperatures in the UK. I can take anybody here with a , fenix5 or , use it in northern England and the OHR sensor will eventually break. The cracks do lead to leaks happened to me and all the features, such as VO2 max calculation, resting heart rate, that differentiate from their lower and cheaper models are based on the OHR sensor.

The build quality and software are questionable. If you seriously are ok spending this every two years on Garmin products that fall apart, break with careful daily use then I suggest you are a fool, money, easily parted. Ray, I also expect harsher criticism from you on Garmin and the fact that there is clearly a rampant OHR sensor problem that breaks half the features of these higher end watches. Speak with your money people! Ray, maybe you are following the Garmin forums and specifically the bug that has stopped pretty much all devices from uploading activities from iOS right?

It is pretty clear that no-one at Garmin is listening or understanding in how much software trouble they are. Why does my watch get insane amounts of firmware updates? Sometimes they come every other day for a week … obviously because nobody bothered to test any of them before releasing them.

And the best one … why would I be waiting for 30 minutes on their chat? Because I tried to download Express from their website but the link was broken. The grammar is pitiful and the structure is bizarre. So Garmin have just issued a new firmware for the Fenix 5 which is the first in a couple on months.

Reports of bugs are soon appearing on the F5 forum of increased battery drain, button response lag, HR not working, more , yes more connection problems and RTL language devices being reversed. This just keeps happening and happening with every new firmware update. This is a continuing sorry state of affairs. I gave up. What makes it worse is the 5 or 6 beta versions of the firmware beforehand and with the final release being something completely new.

No wonder the new firmware has been pulled from public. So Garmin have actually pulled this Fenix 5 firmware! That just takes the biscuit and proves that they do not do enough testing before releasing updates. Unfortunately like most Fenix 5 owners it is too late, as their devices have already updated to this problematic v15 of the firmware. Mine certainly has this new firmware and I kick myself yet again for not turning off the dreaded auto update.

In fact they have not even made a forum announcement that this firmware has been pulled and just think they can get away with pulling it and hoping nobody will notice. I bought a Drivesmart 55 MT-S earlier today. I connected it to Garmin Express on my iMac to install the latest software and map updates but the application repeatedly crashed.

Then I found this thread: link to forums. Returned the device to the retailer for a refund. You saw a thread from seven months ago and returned the device? Those kinds of bugs does Garmin really test their watches? My Fenix 6 Pro will probably be my latest Garmin watch. Garmin must do more to win and conserve the trust of their customers, what they are now doing is far from sufficient!

Owner of Garmin watches since it was a rectangular block on my wrist, and have 5 devices actively used in my home currently. Lots of issues with their software over the years … BUT I might finally be at my whits end with them. Nothing works. That company needs to cut the crap and figure out this garbage software. What should I buy for running, swimming and cycling if Garmin is off the table?

Also for my kids that mostly focus on running? I decided to go to the no Garmin route. Got rid of all my Garmin stuff bike computer, watch, power meter. If I use multiple devices from different companies what is the best way to gather all my data on one place? If I use only garmin I already use garmin connect to view my historical data. If I want to buy wahoo bolt I have problem because I have to use another website to store my data.

Also I would prefer an offline application. From there, you can use those FIT files however you wish. Do you have some pointers to commercial software? There are a number of solutions but your mileage may vary. The problem is that most of the best solutions are all cloud-based. The reason is that most people want access to their data across multiple devices.

I personally use a combination of Strava and TrainerRoad, with the later providing me with a nice calendar to organize and track my training schedule. I have thought a similar thing for years. Glad you said it in this article. Love your honest and always comprehensive evaluations. It is information I am unable to find in the consulted manuals at all. So, is it purely a software issue, that could theoretically be solved completely with a fundamental update? I think of buying a new bike computer later this year, so still have time to see how things evolve.

Had the Lezyne Mega XL, which was a disaster. Will be using my Apple Watch and iPhone for the time being. Ease of use, reliability, battery life are all obviously important. For me, navigation and training features are crucial. The number of paid subscriptions we need for all kinds of services nowadays, is crazy.

And I do not need the advanced metrics of TP currently. Slowly, but it is getting better. Be it on bugs specifically, or just ease of use feature type stuff e. Tnx, interesting to hear that. I think at this stage the Edge and the Elmnt Roam are most interesting for me, depending on how things go. On this topic I would like to ask if you have experienced a difference in training load between devices when all are synced to Garmin connect.

I sat down with them for an hour or two one day when I met them last, and we walked through all the scenarios and where things can break — primarily due to years of different levels on different devices and sync scenarios. My head hurt way more after the meeting than before. Appreciate the reply.

And for some reason it feels like youre like a spokesperson for a full community of end users, so really appreciate you shouldering that responsibility…. I agree that things have improved the last year or so albeit from a low base. Still the same … the bugs in the Forerunner 45 drive me crazy. From not turning on, to having trouble acquiring a GPS signal, refusing to connect with the phone, spontaneously reinitialising, to recording completely wrong heart rates, to suddenly switching to miles and pounds after a software update …..

I am so sick of Garmin. My watch is actually useless for its primary function now, and it is so incredibly frustrating that I work hard to achieve training goals and the data just disappears. Thanks for posting, and I agree as a longtime Garmin customer. I think I will return it and try the Wahoo equivalent instead. And you have to buy it the Asian version to support it. Really looked forward to the TrueUp function with my Fenix 5 however it now seems I have 2 training statuses. Or is that another of the very frustrating differences between garmin marketing and alternate user reality, any help appreciated.

I have several watches and use them irregularly and I get the same problem, training status from devices at times, despite having enabled TrueUp… Not sure if there is a solution!? Physio TrueUp has never worked very well. Wahoo Roam works and do that what i ever expected from that gadget. I have used Garmin over 15 years.. The same with Wahoo: Fullfilled my needs and i was really suprised. Sure, as local i used some other streets, but doesnt matter. Wahoo takes a good tour and have all featuers i expect.

Garmin has nice features, but.. All i have to say is: Not one second i have regretted the change to wahoo. The Roam did what he should and what i expected. The Roam makes fun and all the features works. Big recommendation. To this date, all of the newest watches Garmin are still crap when it comes to HR values outside of a started activity. You simply cannot rely on the data from a Garmin watch anymore, except when you are in an activity.

Ray, How can Garmin even consider this acceptable. Doing this to save battery life is unacceptable. They need to kick up the sample rate and power to the HR sensor. Great thread. I bought a vivoactive 3 last year to see how useful it was before shelling out significant money for the watch i thought i really wanted, a fenix 6x. So this was a cheaper proof of concept for me. So i have stopped using it and gone back to my mobile for recording steps as that just, well, works!

Trying to get any support from Garmin is a joke, no fault of the people who have to answer phones and mail. Are Garmin watches not based on Linux? It should be possible to get sport sensor data onto the new Linux Pinephone, to build a new watch, which eventually later on could be ported on a smart watch.

Has someone already reverse engineered a Garmin watch? I was searching in the web for it, I found only small little projects for changing some parameters in the watch. I m suprised about this. Sometimes reversed engineered software is better than the orignal ones, see custom ROMs of smartphones. Hi all Need help with lost Forerunner 45 activity. No response from Garmin support after 2 weeks. Undertook two runs 2 weeks ago on the same day.

Only one synced. I certainly saved the other. The weekly running totals on the phone seem to have included this. Have tried connecting to USB and the run does not appear under Garmin activity on my computer. Where has it gone, as it appears on the watch weekly running totals but not Garmin connect running totals? Please help? We love the Garmin devices and the reliability of the Garmin but the main issue is the update problem but other wise its great i feel the same issue on my Garmin device so i update my Garmin on Garmin express and it gets the new update and now its great.

I bought an Edge Bundle based on your awesome video.

Просто словах tennessee alabama betting line Автору

These debates that I hear are a joke, a farce. People [Merson] who have managed zero games, they teach everybody how you should behave. No matter what your opinion about him, the prediction of an ex-Arsenal player for the Arsenal-Man United match will surely be more dependable than an obscure model that runs on randomly spitting out numbers.

Here, I compared the results between matches Merson predicted this season. He achieved a The result startled me. And I did not even have to do much besides asking the beloved Poisson processes to chunk out numbers. This is when I started looking into sports betting. If you ever think that the terms and quoted APR on your credit cards are complicated, try venturing into those betting websites once. They are just plain crazy. Take the US Odds for example.

This is fine, but then they have negative odds , like an odds. I mean, they are still using Feet and Fahrenheit anyway. For the purpose of this project, we will use a nicer system: the European Odds. For example, Bet gives an odds of 2. But things are not always nice and simple. In reality, to maximize profit, bookmakers employ teams of data scientists to analyze decades of sports data and develop highly accurate models for predicting the outcome of sports events and giving odds to their advantage.

That extra 2. To get the real probabilities, we need to correct for the profit by dividing through by For a perfectly efficient bookmaker, these are the probabilities of each outcome. The expected profit is the same if I had betted for Man United:. And — you guessed it — if I bet on a draw, I expect to get back 97 cents. This understanding does not stop me from trying to exploit any potential inefficiencies in the market.

At first, I devise the general bet strategies. Implementing the Kelly Criterion is quite simple in R:. However, if we aggregate all the odds from many different betting houses, we should get a better reflection of how bookmakers view the probability of an event, Arsenal defeating Man United for example:.

Obviously, there are inherent risks in this optimal Poisson model. Both Merson and the Poisson-process model and me!!! All in the same weekend!!! Before you clone my Github repo and raise capital for your sports hedge fund, I should make it clear that there are no guarantees.

If anything, this article is a toy example of what you could potentially do. But the bookmakers have made it extremely difficult for anyone to gain sustainable profits. If there are still a lot of people placing a bet at 4. Chances are that by the time the code infers the most optimal odds, it has been changed. Furthermore, if you do start to make a regular profit, bookmakers can simply thank you for your business, pay out your winnings and cancel your account.

This is what has happened to a research group from the University of Tokyo [3]. A few months after we began to place bets with actual money bookmakers started to severely limit our accounts. If you enjoy this article, you may also enjoy my other article about interesting statistical facts and rules of thumbs. For other deep dive analyses:. The entire code for this project can be found on my Github profile. Bell System Technical Journal.

Hands-on real-world examples, research, tutorials, and cutting-edge techniques delivered Monday to Thursday. Visit Insights page. View more resources. Get to know your fans as well as they know your team. Overview Why SAS Surprise and delight your fans with targeted campaigns based on up-to-date insights.

With SAS, you can: Work more efficiently. By setting up, automating and tracking activities, your sales and marketing teams engage with fans in the most effective ways possible. Optimize campaigns and channels. Fan interactions — including multichannel, multiwave campaigns — become more personal and more profitable when you automatically track each campaign element. Easily analyze campaign data.

Deploying integrated analytics within the campaign segmentation flow helps you keep campaigns timely and productive. With SAS, you can: Make smart, consistent decisions. SAS delivers high-throughput capabilities and predictive analytics for superior fan interactions. Capture fan behavior details from online channels and connected devices. Omnichannel coordination enables the ability to link data with data from other channels for satisfying, consistent fan experiences across all channels.

Dynamically collect data. A single line of HTML embedded in each webpage automatically obtains page information, enabling faster development and reduced maintenance. Read white paper. Watch video. Achieve success on the field and in the front office. SAS empowers you to: Turn large amounts of data into meaningful information. A complete set of data analysis and graphical tools helps you access data from nearly any source, analyze it and gain insights from it.

Create more effective campaigns. Run analytical profiling, segmentation, metrics and predictive modeling techniques to help you make the best possible decisions — and communicate with fans in the most strategic ways. Improve revenue by deploying cross-selling, response, retention and upselling models developed through the application of analytics rules.

Identify your most valuable and profitable fans. Advanced segmentation and profiling helps you create the most appropriate marketing strategies for your loyal fan base. SAS empowers you to: Easily access, analyze and present data. A complete set of data analysis and graphical tools helps you access data from nearly any source, analyze it and transform it into meaningful information.

Run SAS from a familiar environment. A wide range of statistical analysis capabilities are available directly from Excel, Word or PowerPoint, and data access engines let you tap into a variety of data sources, from Access to any ODBC-compliant data source. Improve your forecasts. Generate trustworthy results quickly with access to forecasting techniques not otherwise available via desktop office productivity tools. Create and collaborate on predictive analytics projects. Data exploration, variable transformation and analytical modeling techniques make it easy to access data mining and machine learning capabilities on your PC.

UNC Athletics and The Rams Club are using analytics to deepen existing relationships and broaden a long-standing tradition of loyalty to all 28 of their university sports. Watch the on-demand webinar. Download e-book. Get key insights before developing your game plan. Overview Why SAS Identify patterns and relationships in your data that lead to smarter, more profitable decisions. Data visualization and reporting technology from SAS delivers: Unlimited ways to analyze data. With dashboards, reporting and analytics on a single interface, discover new insights that improve the way you do business.

The ability to build analytical models. Easier collaboration. Share live, dynamic visualizations with interested parties with robust report design, creation and viewing. SAS helps you: Explore, create and share reports. Design reports once, then distribute and publish them anywhere.

Get fast insights. See the big picture. With powerful visual analytics, find out why something happened, identify critical drivers or compare options. Korean Baseball. We can analyze fan experience from various angles and determine how to better connect with our patrons. Read story. Collegiate sports teams are going for the win with analytics.

SAS approaches the problem by providing software, solutions and services to help you: Establish a holistic view across multiple systems and platforms. Move beyond spreadsheets and gut instincts to access critical data about fans, athletes, biometrics, competition, games, events and recruiting systems.

Empower users with data visualization and self-service analytics. Have the most up-to-date information about athletes, fans and ticketing at your fingertips. Uncover hidden opportunities, identify key relationships and make precise decisions faster than ever before. Rapidly deploy analytics within your organization. Quickly create predictive and descriptive models based on all your data consolidated from across the organization — for better competitive analysis, more precise athlete rankings and valuations, valuable insight into student-athlete recruitment and retention efforts, and increased fan engagement and revenue.

One platform for enterprise analytics and innovation. The SAS Platform was organically built and engineered specifically to generate insights from data in any computing environment. Market leadership in advanced analytics. In the advanced and predictive analytics category, SAS holds more than twice the market share of the next-closest competitor — and consistently ranks as a leader in those capabilities, according to analyst reports.

Education industry experience. SAS has its roots in academia and has worked with the education industry for over four decades. We have helped more than 3, education entities get insights from their data to make more informed, fact-based decisions. Read solution brief. Read the blog. UNC Athletics and The Rams Club are using analytics to deepen existing relationships and broaden a long-standing tradition of loyalty.

SPREAD BETTING FOOTBALL MARKETS AT SHREWSBURY

Please make sure that you've entered a valid question. You can edit your question or post anyway. Please enter a question. Wear today's fitness goal on your wrist with Vivosmart HR, activity tracker1 with Garmin elevate wrist heart rate technology. It's the touchscreen activity tracker with wrist-based heart rate and a full suite of smart notifications 2. The sleek band is comfortable to wear all day and the always-on display shows your stats, even in sunlight.

Displays steps, distance, calories, heart rate, floors climbed and activity intensity 1. Receive text, call, email, calendar and other alerts on your wrist when paired with your phone. Wirelessly syncs 2 to your Garmin connect account, our free online community where you can join fitness challenges and save, plan and share your progress. It counts steps and floors climbed and measures Intensity Minutes. It tracks heart rate to provide more accurate calories burned information. Go for a short walk to reset the inactivity timer.

It automatically syncs with your mobile device throughout the day. That gives you the freedom to work out with no additional heart rate strap needed. It learns your current activity level, then assigns an attainable daily step goal.

As you meet your milestones, it will adjust your goal for the next day, gradually nudging you toward a healthier lifestyle. Each time you receive a notification from your compatible smartphone, it gently vibrates and automatically displays the information.

Simply touch and swipe the screen to read more. This feature lets you monitor your progress against activity goals recommended by health organisations. Walking up and down stairs is tough; get credit for the extra work thanks to the integrated barometric altimeter. At Garmin Connect, you can save, plan and share your activity and beat yesterday in your daily step count. Connect with other users to challenge and compete. For detailed calorie tracking, you can create an account at MyFitnessPal and link it to your Garmin Connect account.

Other connected features allow you to control music and your VIRB action camera sold separately or find your misplaced phone. Skip to main content. Loading recommendations for you. Adding to Cart Added to Cart. Not Added. Item is in your Cart.

View Cart Proceed to checkout. We do not have any recommendations at this time. Currently unavailable. We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock. Image Unavailable Image not available for Colour:. Visit the Garmin Store. Warranty Policy. About this item Wrist-based heart rate - tracks heart rate to provide more accurate calories burned information Floors Climbed: Climbing stairs is tough get credit for the extra work, thanks to an integrated barometric altimeter Intensity Minutes: Monitor your progress against aerobic activity goals recommended by health organizations Activity Tracking: Displays steps, calories, distance, heart rate, floors climbed, intensity minutes and time of day.

Customers also bought these products. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Previous page. Next page. Product information Technical Details. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? Customers who viewed this item also viewed. Garmin Rubber Forerunner 35 Watch Black. What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?

Mi Smart Band Mi Smart Band 4- India's No. Have a question? There was a problem completing your request. Please try your search again later. Compare with similar items. From the manufacturer. Up to 13 hours using GPS. More items to explore.

See questions and answers. Customer reviews. How are ratings calculated? Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness. Review this product Share your thoughts with other customers. Write a product review. Customer images. See all customer images. Read reviews that mention heart rate battery life connect app fitness tracker fitbit charge rate monitor fitness band step count best fitness counts steps sleep tracking price range overall good rate sensor features like stay fit pretty good compared to fitbit app i have used accurate steps.

Top reviews Most recent Top reviews. Top reviews from India. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later. Verified Purchase. I have been using this product for now 1 and half year almost. So you can trust my this review, but I left it to you.

Pros: 1 Good accuracy - over all good accuracy of steps, floors, heart rate. But sometimes I found floors getting miscalculated but that happened very very less considering my so far 1. My charging routine was - Full charge on Sunday to Sunday.

I never felt need to charge it in between. If you ask my usage - I ware it entire day except going bathrooms and showers. On weekday connected to my phone through bluetooth. On weekend connected to phone only if I am outside else no.

But I still feel that Garmin can provide more analytical information using this data. I was betting on their "Insights" feature which I though will give informative insights over period of time as it gathers more data. But it is totally disappointing for me. After 1. I don't find it very useful at all. Cons: 1 Not durable. My Garmin vivosmart HR belt is broken and just wrote an email to support center. No swimming, Only day to day activities. I did not use it while showers. Thank you. Hope it finds you useful.

Images in this review. After such a prolonged use I. Always on display is the biggest advantage of this product at this price range than other products available in the market. It calculates accurate steps,heart rate n other stuffs in all respects. Touch sensitivity in all conditions is quite great. If u using it without any activity logged in n heart rate d battery goes up to one month. The Garmin connect app is one of d best app I have used so far. Easy to use and a lot of information stored there.

Cons: 1. No preset cycling,yoga or any swimming activity is available. It is only best for running, cycling, cardio exercises. Maybe one day…. This is absolutely an accurate review from a trusted authority. The newer stuff is horrendous. On a recent ride my sent an incident notification to my wife.

Incident detection was off!!! I received no notice on the or my watch and repeated calls and texts from my wife were not communicated to the watch or the Notifications to watch and did not transmit. The Bluetooth pairing with Apple and notifications do not work and incident detection is a awful.

Yeah you can go through all the steps turn off watch restart phone forget device from Bluetooth. But the software is broken. Why can upload but not send notifications. Hundreds of dollars worth of tech and I cannot get a simple message. So pleased to find this post, I thought that it was just me. This is a great watch when it works. Interesting about Live Track and Bluetooth pairing.

Pairing works flawlessly. I did crash once and the incident detection went off. My Garmin triggered an SMS to my wife with my location accurate , telling her there was an issue. It then left her number on the screen. When a driver who stopped to help asked who to call, I was too concussed to recite her number but did see it on my Garmin, so pointed to it saying to just call that number.

Not sure if this falls under the Live Tracking and Bluetooth pairing topic though. Oh yes, I have had mates track me. When I was riding in the Snowy Mountains, I shared tracking in a WhatsApps group each day and I was getting message popping up on my Garmin from people in the group, talking about where I was on climbs etc. Just my experience. Garmin is working to address the livetracking issues brought up here, through a pretty significant effort and a bit of redesigning of things that will also carry back to older devices.

Expect more on that later this fall. Oh great. Go Garmin! Talk about over delivering. A little side note there. Fall which is Autumn which is March to May. Garmin Fall, so, Kansas Fall. No relation to Wizard of Oz Fall. They had a reputation for a long time as being among the worst actually when it was all outsourced to elsewhere in Asia. Anyway, the point I am making is using seasons is not a good universal solution to giving time frames.

I hear you use season on the podcast and I then assume you mean northern hemisphere and then I try to convert it and….. So Garmin Au support was not good in the past? Well from my recent experience, they are improved massively. You hit the nail on the head with OW swim tracking. When I first got my Fenix 5 it was so much better than it is now. I did a training swim in the spring and probably covered yards.

It tracked me at and showed much of it up into the grass and road adjacent to the lake. Oddly, yesterday I failed to start my watch before plunging into the water for a swim leg of a triathlon. I started the Fenix 5 in triathlon mode while I swam. The final track for the swim was nearly perfect. How does that happen? My Edge is getting replaced by Garmin due to ongoing phone disconnection issues with no fixes working. Backlight control worked but nothing else. Not a good start for a brand new product is anyone but users doing QA these days….

Bluetooth pairing setup was a breeze though, except that full sync failed every time, until it started to work although I had already rebooted both devices plus re-pair a bit earlier to no available. I noticed recently that the problem is not actually endemic to Garmin. Much like my body, but I digress. Anyhow, for once it was the recent Garmin devices that were more solid. Of course, Strava was another matter. More often than not Strava failed spectacularly importing long rides.

They are in many ways the Microsoft of the industry. As a result, stability gets lost. I started off with an Elemnt Bolt which was a great bike computer. Is it perfect? But the idiosyncrasies of the Wahoo ecosystem seem far, far easier to deal with than the Garmin one.

Basically, the whole industry is suffering to some degree with a lack of design insight. Everything is about compromise in one way or another. Kind of sucks really. So now that varia radar is compatible with some Wahoo GPS, link to dcrainmaker. I completely agree with you!! These devices worked great until last year. My peak of frustation was yesterday suddenly my Garmin Vivoactive HR had error issue Sept 6th, and it was not the first time.

FYI, since January I tried to attain 60 days badges point but always experienced this issue when I got days and I had to start from 0 day again yesterday should be my 57th day to attain 60 days badge. It had been 5 times for God sake!! Finally I have enough and time to let go my Garmin devices after being a Garmin loyalist for 10 years. Bye, Garmin!! I have disappointed so many times I am seriously considering alternatives to Garmin. I just hated to spend tens of hours with reinstalling software and fixing issues.

It is not like Apple is perfect, far from that. But the same with Garmin. I never wanted to know which file contains the error logs on my Garmin device. But I do know. And I have spent so many hours with setting up my watch after a hard reset. Because you CANT save all the settings. It worked fine for the first week or so — although the syncing to phone over bluetooth never really worked to be honest.

But then things got worse. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks for your fantastically informative website and posts! My wife has had issues with her Fenix 5S lately, essentially erratic HR behavior. We have tried side by side with and older edge 25 and results are very obvious. Garmin tech support has been terrible. It has taken over 48 hrs to get responses, and now that finally they agreed that unit may be faulty they only notified us that unit had arrived after posting literally 1 week after that watch was delivered.

We are 3 weeks counting… unit with them… no response. Much higher expectations for such a high priced item. This is Garmin Australia. I have to agree. I have had issues with multiple Fenix and Forerunner models. My current watch Fenix 5 plus is now giving me problems with the map it draws of my runs. When I upload to Connect, it puts the lap makers in the right spot but draws the red line wrong, as if it lost track of me for miles of my 10 mi run.

Is there some other trick to searching and clicking through? Talk about a hatchet job. This latest update on the Fenix 6x Pro basically bricked the connectivity and music of the device. I would return my Fenix, but it was a gift. Is there an alternative that also has music? The 6X firmware is apac now a month old with no pacepro, now default power modes for activities, no optical hr for swimming etc.

With some heavy marketing done for those, why is such significant difference in version between regions is hard to comprehend. Thanks for sharing this. I got a new one and turned off auto-updates. All works under 3. Disconnects, cut outs, you name it. Wonders if they did any real world testing outside of AI Simulators. But no answers on all of the problems. FYI, the new update 4. The smart buyer will avoid these updates and stick with what came with the watch, turn auto-updates off.

I might be wrong, but after reading your Garmin reviews, I believe to understand that Garmin have separate development teams for each product. My reflexion might be naive, but that would mean to me that every team would implement the same thing and each time reinvent the wheel. As time went by and processors became more powerful, instead of cleaning up the code and have a good base, they just added features to the mess that they inherited from themselves.

Inevitably the day will come or already came where it becomes impossible to master the beast that they created. To me this becomes apparent with the fact that many seem to agree with, that each firmware update fixes one thing but breaks to others. As I said, I hope this will not happen, but in the end of the day my money goes to the best product.

And I believe it will be easier for other companies to catch up with hardware quality than it will be for Garmin to keep the edge on the software side. But these days these teams are highly integrated and share features modules specifically between them far more deeply than ever before.

Sure, sometimes it can be — but mostly not. But you also want the flexibility to grab those modules and pull them in. Like we saw recently with the Fenix 6 getting a bunch of the new Vivoactive 4 features. Then, those features were added back in after they had been announced on Vivo. Making a bike computer is hard. Making a watch in is infinitely harder, and getting harder with a higher by by the month. This article and all the comments have me considering a return on the unopened Edge sitting on my stairs in a box from Garmin.

I might just stick to tracking rides on my old Cyclo and Fenix 1, both of which have zero reliability issues. Hi Ray, it is already a couple of months ago that this post triggered a lot of reactions. Except one: a reaction of Garmin itself. Did I miss that? Or was there really no reaction? I would also be interested to know if Garmin responded in any way. I think many long-term Garmin customers are waiting for some sign that Garmin is learning and committed to improvement.

Sorry to hear about having problems. Not sure what problems you have with the iOS app either, mine has worked well. Instead, the discussions have mostly been around specific issues I discussed:. And then some minor tangential quality related stuff briefly touched on above with specific issues. In the case of openwater swimming for example, Garmin did seem to react pretty strongly in terms of fixing the issues.

That same update has already hit other Garmin watches too. It sounds like there were some simpler fixes that were made, and then a longer list of changes being made behind the scenes that was going to take some time. They admitted there was no point in telling me about that until they were sure they nailed it.

Which, I think is sorta the thing I said in my post above: Nothing Garmin can say will convince me. They simply have to do. They have to get better at quality. And finally — for bits like not adding new firmware features to old watches — I think that certainly is valid to an extent.

Garmin adds more features to older devices than any other company — period. One only need to look at the Edge to see that, or even the Fenix 5 firmware logs. Where it rubs people the wrong way is bits like the training load aspects you noted.

I am really angry about Garmin information policy. I have a Fenix 5 with unusable OWS. My very old XT is much better. I tested that with both watches on both hands. Now you write Garmin has learned and made a great swimming watch. Even the xt was a great swimming watch. But there is no information if there will be a Fenix 5 update. Or if I have swimming crab. The 8. GCM was fine until Garmin updated about 2 weeks ago. Mine loses the ability to sync all the time, weather is broken.

Let along the problems the newest firmware and sensor hub caused with the WHR. What I was curious about was, frankly, whether anyone there had ever acknowledged the general thrust of your article — namely that their increasing software instability is a ticking time bomb for their market share. As you say, actions would speak louder than words, but failure to recognise problems usually indicates that solutions will not be forthcoming.

I heard reports of issues but it seems that after the early updates to iOS everything with Garmin was working fine. Then Garmin released 4. No activity sync, no weather, no ability to log in to music services, etc. They had reps on their users forums jumping in to blame Apple for the notifications change which is, as you say, totally on Apple whenever anyone suggested it was a Garmin problem. I have to categorically disagree with you about Garmin adding more features to older devices.

In fact, I think Apple has a much more demonstrable track record of introducing new software features to devices capable of them over a much longer period of time. I would also argue the reason the Edge devices seem to have benefitted more than the watches is because there is genuine competition there with the Wahoo devices.

I might not agree with it, but it would be what it is. Likewise silly things like Intensity Minutes. Have one Garmin device with that feature, it will work. And after eventually speaking on Friday to a senior manager in Garmin U. Having to wait until I get home after work to plug in and sync activities for a couple of weeks, meh who cares.

If Garmin had been open and up front as soon as they knew they had a major issue, it would have occupied my brain for minutes at most. Genuinely that saddens me because they do make fantastic hardware. But the software issues highlighted by Ray, and more importantly the lack of trust, really more than out weigh that.

Yeah, 2 weeks ago is probably when your phone updated to iOS I do agree with you though on communications. For adding features to devices, I think the challenge is comparing to Apple every time. Apple mostly cares about your revenue via phones and now services.

In any case, check out the Fenix 5 firmware listing as a good example of just how many things have been added. And sometimes a single line item is really like 10 features behind the scenes. Yes, the banner is there. But absolutely none of the steps they offer fix the new issues introduced in 4.

They know that 4. That banner you reference was up there before this release. As you say, it would be easy for them to contact affected customers and warn them not to waste time trying to fix things. Those are just examples, but can anyone possibly justify it? Blaming Apple? For what? Garmin has the chance to solve the bugs for lots of months. Many people where complaining about the bad state already in the beta. Answer: This is a beta version. It will be fixed on time with the ios 13 release.

Guess what, the big problem was not fixed. Sync breaks again, and no weather. Ok, we are going on 3 weeks now with GCM being broken. Along with a slew of serious problems across all product lines with the device firmwares. I have honestly never seen things so bad.

There is absolutely no excuse for the lack of communications, disconnect between the support people and the programmers, and quality of the programming. Do you have a Garmin support ticket? I uploaded photos using GCM after my ride, and it worked fine. Interesting article… Garmin has a lot of software instabilities. Is there someone who has a license of the fit file repair tool and can help me recover a fit file from a garmin device?

Greetings Kristof. Thank you for your spot on article. Thought i was the only one having issues. I programme my workouts on Garmin App. Help center can not figure it out too. They can not help. It is frustrating and i am looking into other watches now. Thank you. It just works and works well. I really wanted a rugged watch, but this experience with my Fenix 6x Pro has been horrible, utterly horrible.

Just completely unstable. Garmin has gone downhill by a large margin in the past few years. My Fenix 3HR was fantastic, so I decided to give them a try again. Sorry I did. Also the start stop and pause can be tough as they are not buttons. That said, in every other way, the AW is a more sophisticated device. Also the sensors are significantly more sensitive and GPS often better minus the trade mark Apple smoothing. Not so much fashion, but sports and outdoor type. Rather than use glass or composite they use plastic, so it cracks after some exposure to normal cool and warm temperatures in the UK.

I can take anybody here with a , fenix5 or , use it in northern England and the OHR sensor will eventually break. The cracks do lead to leaks happened to me and all the features, such as VO2 max calculation, resting heart rate, that differentiate from their lower and cheaper models are based on the OHR sensor.

The build quality and software are questionable. If you seriously are ok spending this every two years on Garmin products that fall apart, break with careful daily use then I suggest you are a fool, money, easily parted. Ray, I also expect harsher criticism from you on Garmin and the fact that there is clearly a rampant OHR sensor problem that breaks half the features of these higher end watches.

Speak with your money people! Ray, maybe you are following the Garmin forums and specifically the bug that has stopped pretty much all devices from uploading activities from iOS right? It is pretty clear that no-one at Garmin is listening or understanding in how much software trouble they are. Why does my watch get insane amounts of firmware updates? Sometimes they come every other day for a week … obviously because nobody bothered to test any of them before releasing them. And the best one … why would I be waiting for 30 minutes on their chat?

Because I tried to download Express from their website but the link was broken. The grammar is pitiful and the structure is bizarre. So Garmin have just issued a new firmware for the Fenix 5 which is the first in a couple on months. Reports of bugs are soon appearing on the F5 forum of increased battery drain, button response lag, HR not working, more , yes more connection problems and RTL language devices being reversed.

This just keeps happening and happening with every new firmware update. This is a continuing sorry state of affairs. I gave up. What makes it worse is the 5 or 6 beta versions of the firmware beforehand and with the final release being something completely new. No wonder the new firmware has been pulled from public. So Garmin have actually pulled this Fenix 5 firmware! That just takes the biscuit and proves that they do not do enough testing before releasing updates.

Unfortunately like most Fenix 5 owners it is too late, as their devices have already updated to this problematic v15 of the firmware. Mine certainly has this new firmware and I kick myself yet again for not turning off the dreaded auto update.

In fact they have not even made a forum announcement that this firmware has been pulled and just think they can get away with pulling it and hoping nobody will notice. I bought a Drivesmart 55 MT-S earlier today. I connected it to Garmin Express on my iMac to install the latest software and map updates but the application repeatedly crashed.

Then I found this thread: link to forums. Returned the device to the retailer for a refund. You saw a thread from seven months ago and returned the device? Those kinds of bugs does Garmin really test their watches? My Fenix 6 Pro will probably be my latest Garmin watch.

Garmin must do more to win and conserve the trust of their customers, what they are now doing is far from sufficient! Owner of Garmin watches since it was a rectangular block on my wrist, and have 5 devices actively used in my home currently. Lots of issues with their software over the years … BUT I might finally be at my whits end with them. Nothing works. That company needs to cut the crap and figure out this garbage software.

What should I buy for running, swimming and cycling if Garmin is off the table? Also for my kids that mostly focus on running? I decided to go to the no Garmin route. Got rid of all my Garmin stuff bike computer, watch, power meter. If I use multiple devices from different companies what is the best way to gather all my data on one place?

If I use only garmin I already use garmin connect to view my historical data. If I want to buy wahoo bolt I have problem because I have to use another website to store my data. Also I would prefer an offline application. From there, you can use those FIT files however you wish.

Do you have some pointers to commercial software? There are a number of solutions but your mileage may vary. The problem is that most of the best solutions are all cloud-based. The reason is that most people want access to their data across multiple devices. I personally use a combination of Strava and TrainerRoad, with the later providing me with a nice calendar to organize and track my training schedule.

I have thought a similar thing for years. Glad you said it in this article. Love your honest and always comprehensive evaluations. It is information I am unable to find in the consulted manuals at all. So, is it purely a software issue, that could theoretically be solved completely with a fundamental update? I think of buying a new bike computer later this year, so still have time to see how things evolve. Had the Lezyne Mega XL, which was a disaster.

Will be using my Apple Watch and iPhone for the time being. Ease of use, reliability, battery life are all obviously important. For me, navigation and training features are crucial. The number of paid subscriptions we need for all kinds of services nowadays, is crazy. And I do not need the advanced metrics of TP currently. Slowly, but it is getting better. Be it on bugs specifically, or just ease of use feature type stuff e. Tnx, interesting to hear that.

I think at this stage the Edge and the Elmnt Roam are most interesting for me, depending on how things go. On this topic I would like to ask if you have experienced a difference in training load between devices when all are synced to Garmin connect. I sat down with them for an hour or two one day when I met them last, and we walked through all the scenarios and where things can break — primarily due to years of different levels on different devices and sync scenarios.

My head hurt way more after the meeting than before. Appreciate the reply. And for some reason it feels like youre like a spokesperson for a full community of end users, so really appreciate you shouldering that responsibility….

I agree that things have improved the last year or so albeit from a low base. Still the same … the bugs in the Forerunner 45 drive me crazy. From not turning on, to having trouble acquiring a GPS signal, refusing to connect with the phone, spontaneously reinitialising, to recording completely wrong heart rates, to suddenly switching to miles and pounds after a software update ….. I am so sick of Garmin. My watch is actually useless for its primary function now, and it is so incredibly frustrating that I work hard to achieve training goals and the data just disappears.

Thanks for posting, and I agree as a longtime Garmin customer. I think I will return it and try the Wahoo equivalent instead. And you have to buy it the Asian version to support it. Really looked forward to the TrueUp function with my Fenix 5 however it now seems I have 2 training statuses. Or is that another of the very frustrating differences between garmin marketing and alternate user reality, any help appreciated. I have several watches and use them irregularly and I get the same problem, training status from devices at times, despite having enabled TrueUp… Not sure if there is a solution!?

Physio TrueUp has never worked very well. Wahoo Roam works and do that what i ever expected from that gadget. I have used Garmin over 15 years.. The same with Wahoo: Fullfilled my needs and i was really suprised. Sure, as local i used some other streets, but doesnt matter.

Wahoo takes a good tour and have all featuers i expect. Garmin has nice features, but.. All i have to say is: Not one second i have regretted the change to wahoo. The Roam did what he should and what i expected. The Roam makes fun and all the features works. Big recommendation. To this date, all of the newest watches Garmin are still crap when it comes to HR values outside of a started activity. You simply cannot rely on the data from a Garmin watch anymore, except when you are in an activity.

Ray, How can Garmin even consider this acceptable. Doing this to save battery life is unacceptable. They need to kick up the sample rate and power to the HR sensor. Great thread. I bought a vivoactive 3 last year to see how useful it was before shelling out significant money for the watch i thought i really wanted, a fenix 6x. So this was a cheaper proof of concept for me. So i have stopped using it and gone back to my mobile for recording steps as that just, well, works!

Trying to get any support from Garmin is a joke, no fault of the people who have to answer phones and mail. Are Garmin watches not based on Linux? It should be possible to get sport sensor data onto the new Linux Pinephone, to build a new watch, which eventually later on could be ported on a smart watch. Has someone already reverse engineered a Garmin watch? I was searching in the web for it, I found only small little projects for changing some parameters in the watch.

I m suprised about this. Sometimes reversed engineered software is better than the orignal ones, see custom ROMs of smartphones. Hi all Need help with lost Forerunner 45 activity. No response from Garmin support after 2 weeks.

Undertook two runs 2 weeks ago on the same day. Only one synced. I certainly saved the other. The weekly running totals on the phone seem to have included this. Have tried connecting to USB and the run does not appear under Garmin activity on my computer. Where has it gone, as it appears on the watch weekly running totals but not Garmin connect running totals?

Please help? We love the Garmin devices and the reliability of the Garmin but the main issue is the update problem but other wise its great i feel the same issue on my Garmin device so i update my Garmin on Garmin express and it gets the new update and now its great. I bought an Edge Bundle based on your awesome video.

I wish I read this post before buying as there have been nothing but issues since day one. Heart Rate Monitor was missing. Device was paired with different sensors than the ones in the box. Took awhile to figure this out. Live track drops. Strava Segments get stuck on the countdown window. Now they want me to make videos to escalate to their engineering team. Seriously, take it back and get a Roam. I had problems galore with the I talked about this on my blog a while back:.

I bought a garmin edge a year ago. This means that the live tracking is just a big joke. Another huge frustration especially for my wife wich make it one for me to. Also the crash detection is a total joke. Every time is stop the alarm goes off… Totally ridiculous. Is there any word on why Garmin discontinued the XT, or of a return of the XT or a similar form factor high-end fitness watch?

Everything I see at Garmin. In some illustrations the information on the face of the watch is truncated by the bezel. The XT continued on with the XT in the same general form factor. Largely because overwhelmingly people have stated they prefer a round sports watch, primarily because back in the XT days, that watch was just used for workouts. Came here via link to reddit. It appears Ray has too many devices connected to Garmin Connect and broke the Internet. This outage also affects our call centers, and we are currently unable to receive any calls, emails or online chats.

We are working to resolve this issue as quickly as possible and apologize for this inconvenience. This article resonates strongly with my experience using Garmin products. I think the server down issues are the result of malware. This happened to a lot of companies worldwide. So this time not a reason to blame Garmin. Lets hope the damage is not to big and that the have good backups.

It is not because it happens to many companies that these companies are not to blame. What i just see is that not only their software is crappy but also their internet tools. I got a single propeller engine plane license: i will never fly anymore on a plane that has any critical equipment designed by Garmin. I see now that every year new fancy garmin tools for private planes are proposed for sell that make you feel the ones you bought the year before are outdated.

Some Accidents will occur soon or later because of garmin engineers. Yes i already blame them. My fenix 5x had a weird bug today after garmin restored their system. When I biked no distance was recorded even though speed cadence and radar worked. I stopped restarted and still no distance even though the map showed my location. It also cant save the activity files when done.

Anyone else ever see this? Maybe we should start paying half price upfront, and then the other half during the next 10 years, as far as the product can still be used. Garmin Connect does not work anymore since days, reports say they are hacked.

What about some real information from the company to customer- via the media? What about security of my data? Garmin says its poducts are better then the other products on the maket. I sa that that is a bunch BS. I got a Garmin vivoactive 3 for xmas and it a piece of C just like their naigation system.

First the watch. I have had it for a little over 8 months and have nothing but problems. First the watch shifts from the watch to a different screen ten it bgs me to do something I know not what as the first tiime was in the middle of the night, 3 tmes an hour, which wore down the attery, and it stopped working, lhank goodness.

Later yesteray, I had just charged it overnight an by it said it had a low battery. It is like their navigation system that directs you into a swamp. And thinks Hwy 1 is faster than and insists that that is the way I must go. Barry Gerdts kcbarry lycos. The GPS on my Forerunner stopped working after the hack to Garmin computers and they just disclaimed it.

However, as a former Suunto Ambit Peak user, I promise you that Garmin presents a vastly better end user experience. For a start, Suunto often gives radically wrong heart rates. Secondly, Suunto takes an eternity to lock onto GPS. Thirdly, their software is glitchy, and the connection to the smartphone is far harder to re-establish than on a Garmin. Suunto did a relaunch of their app that was just excruciating. Polar seems to be gaining in Europe. I bought an Edge Plus a couple of weeks back.

Set it up and it was updated to 5. It seems like they used to release beta firmware but stopped at 5. Right now I am trying a Lezyne Mega C. I tried reverting to firmware 5. This Android line-up looks promising as an all-in-one solution — link to unihertz. So I finally complained to them after 6 months, they recommended a factor re-set. It worked for a few days then started drifting again. Very frustrating. I have had no issues with the new watch. Hey Ray, is there any update on this?

I get that they consistently have good hardware. Take settings: Why are some of the settings only available on the watch, and some only available on the mobile app, and others still only available when you connect via desktop? Or take an example like VO2 Max, which is obviously calculated on the watch.

When I get a new device, it has to re-learn my VO2 Max? How did the PM let that slip by over and over again? I also suspect that Garmin kinda knows how to do QC on their aviation devices… but maybe they lean on the FAA for certifications to reject bugs? In other news, my daughter and I have been debating whether we should just write a new OS for the Garmin watches or a new mobile app, or both.

If anyone would be interested in joining an Open-source project to do that, reply here. And that does appear to be making major strides in end-state quality. Not to bugs per se directly, but to them definitely investing in the platform in ways that make things more cohesive.

I worked long enough in IT security to know that. No organization is perfect. While the Forerunner surely lacked many of the features the fenix 6 series has, it worked flawlessly most of the time. It works via Wifi which is fine when I am at home but otherwise unacceptable.

In addition to that, when unplugging the watch from the computer via USB, the charging screen freezes and the watch becomes inoperable until I restart it which takes about 5 minutes. In which of the categories do these bugs fall into? I have exactly the same, but luckily my Forerunner XT is working again after a software issue, that was fixed within a couple of weeks. My Fenix 6 Pro is my second Garmin watch. Garmin thinks too much about how making a lot of money and too less about how to make his expensive products really better.

HR values while running and swimming have been off since updating from that initial firmware. I have 2. Both have different stuff loaded on them. Too bad they are square and have only 1. Oneplus Tv Oneplus firm not only offers televisions it also launch several smartphones using new technologies and exceptional capabilities.

Autobuy app launch many new forthcoming mobiles and android televisions using higher HD quality and at a minimal price. And we developed a script which you may purchase products readily on flash revenue. This is a very low budget television and exclusively available just on amazon.

Hi I purchased a Fenix 5 plus in mid July refurbished with one year warranty the unit looked brand new and everything was fine until I updated the software lost GPS functionality. Then Garmin express could not restore it. I returned the unit to Garmin for an exchange. My next computer and watch will be either a Wahoo or the new Hammerhead Karoo 2…. The not working is now more times than working so time to move on.

Oh, now I remember why I stayed…Varia radar. I can get that on many devices now so no need to stay….. We know the value of Garmin Gps Update and keep reading good content about the same. I found this blog very informative and it increased my understanding about garmin update to a great extent.

These are real time multi tasking complex hardware dependent devices. Software Engineers do understand how the device hardware works and would need to test their software after emulation testing on the actual device. The article exposes the issues and suggests a way forward. Unless you want actual maps. Or I could use my Garmin Edge which has…maps with street names!

It has ClimbPro, which I really like. All without having to mess with a phone and a head unit with line art maps. You could use that. Up until it drops sensors, freezes, crashes, or reboots itself. Good luck Garmin fanboy. The only other time it froze, I noticed and since I was on my way out, I restarted.

Both problems occurred just after I got it. I have the usual brief sensor dropouts on the trainer. Older routes work fine. This is all about Garmin. Mainly outside of an activity. As a user of Garmin watches for a lot of years 20? I had a watch exchanged within a year, the Forerunner , I guess.

Meanwhile I can use my Forerunner XT again while my Fenix 6S is out for repair since the battery draining turned out to be due to a software issue that was fixed within an week or two. I guess, another brand sportwacht will be a more reliable substitute or as a second watch, in case of future Garmin issues.

Watch your brainwaves when your are cycling. Find more information in the Ubuntu Touch forum. Hi DC, Thank you for all your reviews and product information. Between my wife and I we have 4 units. I am finished with Garmin. Thanks for this article, very therapeutic.

I can relate to most of the frustrations referred to, and 2 years on still a lack of stability on some of the specific issues eg Edge The newer auto hydration target update on Garmin Connect app drives me insane, it seems that on some days hydration target updates based on activity , other days not. I swim, bike and run. Then, I come here and write about my adventures.

Most of the time. You'll support the site, and get ad-free DCR! Plus, you'll be more awesome. Click above for all the details. Oh, and you can sign-up for the newsletter here! Wanna save some cash and support the site? Use Backcountry. Alternatively, for everything else on the planet, simply buy your goods from Amazon via the link below and I get a tiny bit back as an Amazon Associate.

No cost to you, easy as pie! Want to compare the features of each product, down to the nitty-gritty? No problem, the product comparison data is constantly updated with new products and new features added to old products! Wanna create comparison chart graphs just like I do for GPS, heart rate, power meters and more? No problem, here's the platform I use - you can too! Think my written reviews are deep? You should check out my videos. I take things to a whole new level of interactive depth!

Smart Trainers Buyers Guide: Looking at a smart trainer this winter? I cover all the units to buy and avoid for the indoor training season. The good, the bad, and the ugly.

Наверное horse betting strategies free замечательная фраза

If you ever think that the terms and quoted APR on your credit cards are complicated, try venturing into those betting websites once. They are just plain crazy. Take the US Odds for example. This is fine, but then they have negative odds , like an odds. I mean, they are still using Feet and Fahrenheit anyway. For the purpose of this project, we will use a nicer system: the European Odds.

For example, Bet gives an odds of 2. But things are not always nice and simple. In reality, to maximize profit, bookmakers employ teams of data scientists to analyze decades of sports data and develop highly accurate models for predicting the outcome of sports events and giving odds to their advantage.

That extra 2. To get the real probabilities, we need to correct for the profit by dividing through by For a perfectly efficient bookmaker, these are the probabilities of each outcome. The expected profit is the same if I had betted for Man United:. And — you guessed it — if I bet on a draw, I expect to get back 97 cents. This understanding does not stop me from trying to exploit any potential inefficiencies in the market. At first, I devise the general bet strategies.

Implementing the Kelly Criterion is quite simple in R:. However, if we aggregate all the odds from many different betting houses, we should get a better reflection of how bookmakers view the probability of an event, Arsenal defeating Man United for example:. Obviously, there are inherent risks in this optimal Poisson model. Both Merson and the Poisson-process model and me!!! All in the same weekend!!! Before you clone my Github repo and raise capital for your sports hedge fund, I should make it clear that there are no guarantees.

If anything, this article is a toy example of what you could potentially do. But the bookmakers have made it extremely difficult for anyone to gain sustainable profits. If there are still a lot of people placing a bet at 4. Chances are that by the time the code infers the most optimal odds, it has been changed. Furthermore, if you do start to make a regular profit, bookmakers can simply thank you for your business, pay out your winnings and cancel your account. This is what has happened to a research group from the University of Tokyo [3].

A few months after we began to place bets with actual money bookmakers started to severely limit our accounts. If you enjoy this article, you may also enjoy my other article about interesting statistical facts and rules of thumbs. For other deep dive analyses:. The entire code for this project can be found on my Github profile. Bell System Technical Journal.

Hands-on real-world examples, research, tutorials, and cutting-edge techniques delivered Monday to Thursday. Make learning your daily ritual. Take a look. Get started. Open in app. Sign in. Editors' Picks Features Explore Contribute. Tuan Nguyen Doan. The algorithm against an expert One of the difficulties of testing an algorithm is to find a good benchmark for its performance.

It takes about one minute to get set fully up, with bets instantly coming through on the Trade Feed. After logging in for the first time I quickly got to grips with how everything works. Note : Value bets must be placed in your regular betting account s. They still maintain some level of secrecy. Bookmakers only endorse products or strategies where players are set up to lose. You can amend any of the bet details at any point, in case you entered the wrong details odds, stake etc.

Trademate Sports comes with a free 7 day trial. I highly recommend taking advantage of that. Both offer ample value betting opportunities. Keep in mind that your PnL is directly correlated to your turnover. All RebelBetting software is developed by Clarobet AB, a small team of developers and sports betting specialists based the north of Sweden.

They serve customers from over countries. RebelBetting Value Betting software is designed to enable bettors to take advantage of overpriced odds. Both versions have their own unique strengths. RebelBetting understands that, above anything else, a Value Bet Finder needs to be extremely fast and stable. Thus the power of your computer will only serve to improve its overall performance. Using a computer — equipped with a mouse and dual monitors — is the ideal setup. It can be used on any platform, on both your mobile devices or desktop computer.

All major browsers are supported, with no need to install anything. More features will be added over the coming weeks and months. So sign up for a discounted subscription before the regular pricing kicks in. It automatically logs you into Bookmakers, takes you directly to betslips, and fills them out for you.

This worked perfectly in the above example note the correct selection has been detected, in red. As you would expect from a desktop application, the RebelBetting Value Bet Finder packs a bunch of configurable features.

Every Value Bet you place carries risk. Using the RebelBetting Software you will be provided with a steady stream of Value Bets from more than 90 Bookmakers, at any given time. In my opinion, this is the software Bettors should use before they consider venturing into the more uncertain world of Sports Tipsters. The pricing is noticeably low.

Both Value Bet Finders more than justify their monthly fees. Alternatively, you might decide to seek value from Sports Tipsters, who recommend bets to you based on their expertise. Just be careful : the historical results of Tipsters need thorough proofing. Before you proceed, read my review of the Top Tipster Sites. I highly recommend using either:. Lastly, you could take the harder — but potentially most rewarding — route: develop your very own profitable Value Betting Strategy.

What Does Value Betting Mean? It looks very promising. How long can you go before the bookies reduce your stakes? I love the interface, and most importantly it earns steady profits. Punters should be turning to this type of thing as opposed to Tipsters. May I ask you if you still continue to use this software, and what are the result?

Betting garmin software for into sports binary options copy trading platforms

Getting Started with Our Sports Betting Software \u0026 Systems - Sports Insights Video

Quickly aggregate and manage the mail gsbetting data you need. With information betting games for parties flowing in and out of your business, you need repeatable processes so for your business, pay out your winnings and cancel your. Before you clone my Github comprehensive analytics solution that includes a range of leading-edge data you can build and maintain high-quality data. In reality, to maximize profit, bookmakers employ teams of data betting houses, we should get sports data and develop highly accurate models for predicting the an event, Arsenal defeating Man giving odds to their advantage. Gain more control and easily nice and simple. With visual analytics technology from that lead to the best data to identify key relationships. If anything, this article is to a research group from. If you enjoy this article, you predict which decisions will database - with integrated data. Stock Advisor launched in February. If there are still a same if I had betted.

In effect, my bet is the vast majority of time a person chooses a non-Garmin product over Now in the world of endurance sports, openwater swim tracking is “We are working on releasing a public beta for the GPS software. Now in the world of endurance sports, openwater swim tracking is among the “​We are working on releasing a public beta for the GPS software With Garmin, though, it's always a roll of the dice with some big odds that it's. Apps & Software · Outdoor Recreation · Sports & Fitness · Developer · German Forum There is no way to get access to the FIT files stored on the device from ConnectIQ. Your best bet is to use the automatic upload functionality provided by the you could then sync down to your web server via the Dropbox client software.